Showing posts with label Arthur C. Clarke Award Nominee Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arthur C. Clarke Award Nominee Reviews. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2020

2019 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at Foyles Bookshop in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: One of the reasons that I track the Arthur C. Clarke award is that it seems to march to its own beat. The requirements for eligibility - basically being published in the U.K. - don't really seem to shut out many English-language books, and yet the shortlist for this award always seems to be dramatically at odds with most other science fiction and fantasy related awards. I don't see this as a drawback to the award - after all, this just gives a new range of books and authors for me to explore. It is, however, always kind of odd for me to see a shortlist for a speculative fiction award that only includes one book by an author whose name I recognize.

Winner

Rosewater by Tade Thompson

Shortlist
The Electric State by Simon Stålenhag
Frankenstein in Baghdad by Ahmed Saadawi
The Loosening Skin by Aliya Whiteley
Revenant Gun by Yoon Ha Lee
Semiosis by Sue Burke

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2018
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2020

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

2018 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at Foyles Bookshop in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: One of the things that makes the Clarke Award interesting is that its nominees generally have very limited crossover with other major genre fiction awards. I believe the only novel on the Clarke Award shortlist that has also been nominated for another award is Borne by Jeff VanderMeer, which was also nominated for the Locus Award. This lack of commonality with other awards is, in part, due to the fact that this award is limited to genre fiction books that were first published in the United Kingdom, excluding a wide range of books published elsewhere, but it is also due to the difference in tastes between readers in the U.S. and the U.K.

On another note, although they have not done so yet, the "Shadow Jury" participants have announced an intention to provide a "Shadow Shortlist", just as they did in 2017.

Winner

Dreams Before the Start of Time by Anne Charnock

Shortlist
American War by Omar el Akkad
Borne by Jeff VanderMeer
Gather the Daughters by Jennie Melamed
Sea of Rust by C. Robert Cargill
Spaceman of Bohemia by Jaroslav Kalfař

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2017
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2019

Book Award Reviews     Home

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Review - Ninefox Gambit by Yoon Ha Lee


Short review: Tasked with putting down a heretical rebellion within the Hexarchate that has caused calendrical rot, Kel Cheris convinces her superiors to revive the insane dead General Jedao. If that sounds kind of incomprehensible to you, be warned that reading the book only makes it a little bit clearer.

Haiku
Calendrical math
Makes exotic things happen
Immortality

Full review: Ninefox Gambit is a work of military science fiction in which the science fiction is almost incomprehensible, and the military actions are only slightly less so. That said, it is a beautiful book that is not really hampered by the weirdly exotic world that it drops the reader into, and this weirdness is handled so well that by the end, it almost feels natural. Despite the alien strangeness of the setting, the story told in the book is fundamentally almost ordinary, and that manages to root the book in such a way that even with exotic calendar based math warping reality, there is enough that is familiar to hold onto that the story doesn't dissolve into impenetrability. One of the fine lines that science fiction authors have to walk is the balance between presenting a world in which technology and culture are different enough from ours that it feels at least somewhat alien, but not so different that the fictional reality has ranged so far from the familiar that it is effectively unintelligible for the reader. In Ninefox Gambit, Yoon Ha Lee flirts with this line, standing right at the border where the setting would become entirely baffling, and occasionally stepping across for just a little bit, but for the most part remaining just shy of mystifying.

The central conceit of the novel is a brand of mathematics exists called "calendrical math", and by using it one can determine which collection of variables need to be controlled in order to change the way physics works, allowing for a variety of "exotic" technologies that are dependent upon this shared belief system. The government under which the various characters in the book live is the "Hexarchate" and it enforces a rigid calendrical orthodoxy of festivals, remembrances, and torture sessions to power the technologies that underpin the authority of the ruling Hexarchs. Deviations from the calendrical observances are treated as heresies and ruthlessly stamped out. Technology that does not depend upon calendrical math is called "invariant" technology, and is represented as generally being less effective than the calendrically powered "exotic" technologies - and with one notable exception none of the "invariant" technologies are ever really described. The "exotic" technologies are only described in slightly more detail than that: We get names like "Amputation Gun", and "Threshold Winnower", and "Carrion Gun", and a couple of dozen descriptions of various battle formations, but with the exception of the obvious effects some of them have, the technology is never really given any substantial definition.

Some have said that Ninefox Gambit is about calendrical math, but that does not seem to be entirely accurate. There are lots of references to calendrical math in the book, with discussions of people doing computations and the effects of maintaining or not maintaining the calendar, but there is no actual math in the book. To a certain extent this is to be expected - after all, if Lee knew how to do calculations that would reshape the laws of physics, he would be publishing ground-breaking academic papers, not writing fiction. On the other hand, when science fiction authors introduce heretofore unknown technologies into their stories, they usually try to give the reader some general idea of the parameters under which those technologies operate. Calendrical math, however, seems to have no limitation at all, which I suppose might be the point, because once you posit a particular technology that can alter the very fundamental elements of reality, all bets would seem to be off. This gives the book a pervasive sense of unreality, as the central conflict involves putting down a heretical faction that has cropped up and instituted their own calendar with an associated competing set of technologies. Since what is possible with calendrical math is never really explained, the reader really has no grounding in what is possible in this conflict, and as a result, must be content with simply gliding along as the various interested parties explain what is happening as it happens and satisfied with never really understanding exactly why.

One thing that is certain is that the political structure that makes up the Hexarchate are both instrumental to and supported by the maintenance of the orthodox calendrical arrangements. The nation is divided into six factions, each with a defined role within society. The Kel are the soldiers, and are imbued with "formation instinct", which causes them to reflexively follow orders. The Shuos are spies, assassins, and information brokers. The Nirai are mathematicians and creators of the exotic technologies that flow from the calendrical math used by the Hexarchate. The Rahal are the magistrates and judges, charged with enforcing civil order. And so on. Each faction has its place in society, and each member of a faction has a defined role to play. The incomprehensibility of the technology is almost entirely irrelevant to the book. While it is weird to read a book that is basically military science fiction in which none of the actions taken by the various forces involved make any sense because the technology they are using relied upon odd patterns of behavior and geometrical configurations that are never given any more detail than a fanciful name, the simple fact is that all of this exotic technology is just a way to explain the existence of a society that is so rigid that the deadliest heresy is allowing people to have choices.

The core story involves Captain Kel Cheris, a member of the Kel faction of the Hexarchate, whose use of unorthodox formations in response to having heretical weapons deployed against her unit has called attention to herself, leading to the Shuos Hexarch selecting her for a team to evaluate the best way to suppress a heresy that is causing calendrical rot at the heart of one of the most important regions of the Hexarchate in the key position of the Fortress of Scattered Needles. Cheris' proposal is to revive the dead and insane Shuos General Jedao and have him plan the attack that will allow the Hexarchate to retake the fortress intact and reimpose the proper calendrical order. This is a daring and dangerous idea: Daring because when he was alive, Jedao never lost a battle, and dangerous because in his final engagement he killed off the enemy and then turned on his own troops, slaughtering them to a man. The part of the plan that Cheris was not really prepared for is that to revive Jedao, he has to be attached to someone living, and that someone turns out to be her, creating what amounts to private a dialogue between the long-dead General and the living Captain (who is pretty quickly breveted to General for the operation). One might think that such an intimate relationship would engender candor, but like pretty much everyone else in the Hexarchate, Jedao plays his cards extremely close to the chest, even with someone who is literally the only person who can hear him. One problem with books in which intrigue is a major part of the plot is that the author runs the risk of withholding too much information from the reader because the characters would withhold information from one another, resulting in a story in which, from the perspective of the reader, things seem to happen almost at random. Ninefox Gambit doesn't quite sink to that level, but it comes close, and when this is combined with the almost inscrutable nature of calendrical math, the events in the book frequently seem almost haphazard.

For all of the exotic trappings, the story itself is fairly ordinary, although it does have some interesting twists: Rebels rise up against what appears to be a fairly oppressively harsh regime, forces are sent to bring the heretics to heel, various players have their own personal agendas they are trying to advance, and there are a couple of betrayals and reversals to spice things up. The heresy at the center of the story is the revival of the Liozh, a seventh faction that used to exist when the Hexarchate was the Heptarchate before they experimented with democracy and the calendar was revised to remove them. It seems notable that both the Liozh heresy and the creation of Kel formation instinct didn't take place until after Jedao had died the first time, but like all things in this book with its ever shifting reality, this is only an impression and there isn't really anything concrete to base that upon. The one somewhat unique question that seems to loom large in the background, but which is only hinted at, is whether it is possible to have anything resembling what we would recognize as a free society in a world in which calendrical mathematics exists. One can only hope this will be addressed in a future installment of the series.

Ninefox Gambit is a fascinating, confusing, and ultimately frustrating book. In it, Lee posits a strange alien society based upon a technology that is fairly off-the-wall and uses this setting to tell a story that feels oddly comfortable. While Lee never quite reaches the point where the story dissolves into complete chaos, the combination of bizarre technology, an alien society that underpins that technology, and pervasive conspiratorial machinations definitely serves to bring it to the brink of anarchy. There is a lot to love in this book, but there is also a lot that seems to simply whirl about without much rhyme or reason. This seems like a book that people either find interesting, or find absolutely intolerable. The real difficulty is figuring out which kind of person one is, and there's really no way to do that short of trying to read the book. That said, I am the sort of person who found it interesting, and as a result, I think it is definitely worth picking up.

2016 Locus Award Winner for Best First Novel: The Grace of Kings by Ken Liu
2018 Locus Award Winner for Best First Novel: TBD

List of Locus Award Winners for Best First Novel

2017 Clarke Award Nominees
2017 Hugo Award Finalists
2017 Locus Award Nominees
2017 Nebula Award Nominees

Yoon Ha Lee     Book Reviews A-Z     Home

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

2017 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at Foyles Bookshop in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: The most interesting thing about the Clarke Award in 2017 has nothing at all to do with the award itself in any official sense. In February, a group of critics led by Nina Allen formed a "shadow jury" and announced their intention to evaluate the books that had been submitted for the Clarke Award and create their own shortlist out of that assembly of works. This shadow jury consisted of Nina Allan plus Megan AM, Vajra Chandrasekera, David Hebblethwaite, Victoria Hoyle, Nick Hubble, Paul Kincaid, Maureen Kincaid Speller, and Jonathan McCalmont. Over the ensuing two months, they read many of the eligible books and commented upon them. Many of the members of the "shadow jury" came up with their own personal shortlist of finalists, but, more importantly, they all got together and came up with a joint shortlist, which they dubbed the "Sharke Six". This joint shortlist was announced the day before the official Clarke Award shortlist was released, and consisted of the following six books:
  • The Arrival of Missives  by Aliya Whiteley
  • Central Station  by Lavie Tidhar*
  • A Field Guide to Reality by Joanna Kavenna
  • Infinite Ground by Martin MacInnes
  • The Power  by Naomi Alderman
  • The Underground Railroad by  Colson Whitehead*

  • *Also an official finalist.
The first thing one might note about this "alternate" shortlist is that there is some overlap with the official shortlist, although that overlap only amounts to two books. This overlap is notable, because it happens to include one of the books that one of the shadow jurors described as "essential", and declared he would judge the official Clarke Award on whether or not it was included in the shortlist. This declaration came despite assurances from the organizers of the shadow jury that their "idea is not to ‘challenge’ the official jury in any way". It seems that for some of the critics involved, the idea was, in fact, to challenge the official jury.

The real question to ask is whether the creators of the shadow jury lived up to their stated intention to "bring more to the party: more readers, more critics, more books, more discussion". Well, maybe. They certainly brought more critics into the discussion by bringing themselves. From one perspective, they brought more books by having an alternate shortlist that diverged from the official shortlist by four books. On the other hand, they were working from the same longlist of works, so the "more books" claim might be something of a stretch. They brought more discussion by discussing the books they put on their personal lists and giving an account of how they came up with their alternate shortlist, but they probably would have discussed those books anyway, which tempers the claim to more discussion somewhat. On the other hand, I (and others like me) probably wouldn't be discussing this had they not formed a shadow jury, so that can be said to be more discussion. Did they create more readers? Maybe, although I don't see how one could measure that.

On the whole, I'd say that by the metrics they set forth, the shadow jury is a moderate success. What it does mean is that instead of merely having six official Clarke Award finalists, we now have a list of six "official" and four additional "shadow" finalists. I'd say that is something of a win for genre fiction fans no matter how you look at it.

Winner

The Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead*

Shortlist
After Atlas by Emma Newman
Central Station by Lavie Tidhar*
A Closed and Common Orbit by Becky Chambers
Ninefox Gambit by Yoon Ha Lee
Occupy Me by Tricia Sullivan

* Also a shadow finalist.

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2016
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2018

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

2016 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at Foyles Bookshop in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: For the second year in a row the Hugo Awards were dominated by an organized slate campaign determined to wedge sub-par work onto its shortlist of finalists. For the second year in a row, the Clarke Awards presented a contrasting shortlist of highly regarded and high quality works. Almost as if to cast the contrast in the sharpest possible light, the Clarke Award shortlist was announced the day after the Hugo Award finalists were revealed. To be fair to the Hugos, the Best Novel category, which is the one most comparable to the Clarke Award shortlist, is one of those least tainted by malicious Puppies. On the other hand, the Hugo ballot overall is littered with terrible works and incredibly weak selections, making the disparity between the overall quality of the Hugo Award selections and the overall quality of the Clarke Award selections quite apparent.

With a little bit of luck, changes will be voted in during this year's Worldcon that will make it more difficult for malicious slates to dominate the Hugo ballot, but what if they are not. Or, what if the changes are voted in but they are insufficient to prevent slate-voting from continuing to degrade the Hugo ballot? What then? Last year I pointed out that should the slate-based campaigns continue to dominate the Hugo Awards, the locus of science fiction will move to the United Kingdom, putting the BSFA Awards and the Clarke Award in the position to become the premiere awards in genre fiction. That may be overstating things a bit - the Nebula Awards aren't going away any time soon, and neither are the World Fantasy Awards, but what is certain to happen is that other awards will wind up filling the gap left by the diminution of the Hugo Awards. Contrary to what those in some quarters believe, the prestige of an award is not determined by how many people vote upon it, or whether it is ideologically diverse, or anything other than whether people view it as prestigious. If an award is seen as prestigious, it is. It really is as simple as that. If the Hugo Awards stop being seen as prestigious, there are numerous other awards that people will move their attention to, including the Clarke Award.

Some things will certainly be lost in such a transition: The Clarke Award, for instance, only recognizes novels. There are no other awards that honor fan work in exactly the same manner as the Hugos. There are few awards that recognize non-fiction work in the same way, although the BSFA Awards come close. And so on. But so long as awards like the Clarke Award continue to recognize quality works of genre fiction, no amount of manipulation of the Hugos will avail the Pups in their fruitless quest to make everyone like them.

Winner

Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Shortlist
Arcadia by Iain Pears
The Book of Phoenix by Nnedi Okrafor
Europe at Midnight by Dave Hutchinson
The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet by Becky Chambers
Way Down Dark by J.P. Smyth

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2015
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2017

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

2015 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at Foyles Bookshop in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: In 2014, when writing about the Clarke Award nominees, I wondered if the locus of science fiction might move to United Kingdom, given the attacks mounted by conservative authors upon the Hugo Awards. Now 2015 has rolled around, and the attacks have turned into a full-scale ideological assault that has, at least this year, produced a Hugo ballot of highly dubious quality. In contrast, both the Clarke and BSFA Awards have produced excellent nominee slates, studded with great fiction. In short, while American awards seem to be stumbling as their spiritual leader is hounded by yapping cretins, the British-based awards are hitting their stride. If the politically-driven onslaught that has assailed the Hugo Awards continues for a few more years, then my prediction that the locus of science fiction will move to the United Kingdom seems likely to come to pass.

The mere existence of the Clarke Award (and other awards) is why, as with all rage-filled campaigns, the Sad and Rabid Puppies are destined to be frustrated no matter how many times they choose to redefine their goals. The worst possible outcome for the Hugo Awards would be for the awards to be, as one Puppy organizer gleefully hopes, "left as a smoking crater". An only slightly less bad outcome would be for the Hugo Awards to become a battle of opposing slates, destroying the anarchic expression of love that the award has traditionally been. Even if either of these come to pass, then the Puppies will have actually achieved nothing. Fans whose affection for the genre is fueled by love will migrate elsewhere, leaving the Puppy organizers standing amidst the ruins they created wondering why they still don't get any respect. Having the Hugo Awards be sucked dry of credibility or even destroyed would be mourned, but there will always be awards like the Clarke Awards, the Nebula Awards, and the BSFA Awards that will take note of and honor good quality genre fiction. So let the Puppies wail and gnash their teeth. Their ranting will never get them what they desperately want, and ultimately, they will be unable to destroy fandom, because they simply do not understand it.

Winner
Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel

Shortlist
The Book of Strange New Things by Michel Faber
Europe in Autumn by Dave Hutchinson
The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North
The Girl With All the Gifts by M.R. Carey
Memory of Water by Emmi Itäranta

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2014
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2016

Book Award Reviews     Home

Thursday, May 8, 2014

2014 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Stratford Picturehouse in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: To the surprise of almost no one, Anne Leckie won the 2014 Clarke Award with her novel Ancillary Justice, which also looks to be the front runner for the Hugo Award this year. The only remotely surprising thing is the shift away from the all-male slate of the 2013 Clarke Awards to this more balanced ballot. But this raises the question of why this British award has moved to having a diverse array of interesting books covering a wide variety of science fiction topics, while the flagship American-oriented award seem to have been hijacked by right-wing writers venting their venom on women and minorities while fondling their penis-replacing firearms. If this persists for more than a year or two, the central locus of science fiction may very well move out of the United States and to the United Kingdom, or maybe even Australia.

Winner
Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie

Shortlist
The Adjacent by Christopher Priest
The Disestablishment of Paradise by Phillip Mann
God's War by Kameron Hurley
The Machine by James Smythe
Nexus by Ramez Naam

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2013
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2015

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

2013 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Stratford Picturehouse in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: The 2013 slate of Clarke Award nominees was entirely male. I note this because it may be the first time this has happened. Coming on the heels of the win for the Testament of Jessie Lamb in 2012, this exclusively male ballot suggests the possibility that British science fiction publishing is moving in a non-egalitarian direction. I'm not prepared to accept this as true just yet, but when coupled together, they do form the beginnings of a disturbing picture.

Winner
Dark Eden by Chris Beckett

Shortlist
2312 by Kim Stanley Robinson
Angelmaker by Nick Harkaway
The Dog Stars by Peter Heller
Intrusion by Ken MacLeod
Nod by Adrian Barnes

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2012
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2014

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

2012 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: In 1987, Margaret Atwood won the first Clarke Award with The Handmaid's Tale, a harrowing vision of a dystopian future in which women were reduced to little more than breeding stock. Atwood presented this misogynistic dehumanizing of women as a nightmarish turn of events. Twenty-six years later, Jane Rogers on the Clarke Award for The Testament of Jesse Lamb, which presents a vision of history in which the female protagonist turns herself into a brainless incubator for a fetus - an act that is presented as one of selfless nobility. Somehow, over two decades of science fiction, it seems that the status of women in science fiction has gone from an oppressed group struggling to be more than their wombs, to being defined entirely by their wombs. It seems to me that this is a step backwards.

Winner
The Testament of Jessie Lamb by Jane Rogers

Shortlist
Embassytown by China Miéville
The End Specialist by Drew Magary
Hull Zero Three by Greg Bear
Rule 34 by Charles Stross
The Waters Rising by Sheri S. Tepper

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2011
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2013

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

2011 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: One of the most interesting things about the Clarke Award is that it honors works that are first published in the United Kingdom, regardless of the nationality of the author of the work. Many other "national" level awards are aimed at authors of a particular nationality. For example, the Ditmar Awards are only open to authors and other individuals who are from Australia. For the Clarke Award, the national origin of the author is unimportant, so in 2011 it could be won by South African author Lauren Beukes for her novel Zoo City.

Winner
Zoo City by Lauren Beukes

Shortlist
Declare by Tim Powers
The Dervish House by Ian McDonald
Generosity: An Enhancement by Richard Powers
Lightborn by Tricia Sullivan
Monsters of Men by Patrick Ness

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2010
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2012

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

2010 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: With his victory arriving right on schedule, China Miéville won his third overall Clarke Award in 2010, giving him more wins for this award than any other author. Given his established track record of winning the Clarke Award once every five years, I fully expect Miéville to win this award in 2015. In addition to Miéville's accomplishment in this year, Gwyneth Jones was also nominated, making her one of the most frequently nominated authors for the Clarke Award.

Winner
The City & the City by China Miéville

Shortlist
Far North by Marcel Theroux
Galileo's Dream by Kim Stanley Robinson
Retribution Falls by Chris Wooding
Spirit: The Princess of Bois Dormant by Gwyneth Jones
Yellow Blue Tibia by Adam Roberts

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2009
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2011

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

2009 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: I've said this before, but the 2009 slate of Clarke Award nominees will make me say it again: The volume of excellent science fiction being produced in recent years has simply been overwhelming. On this ballot I am partial to Neal Stephenson's book Anathem, but that's mostly because I like Stephenson's work. Being perfectly honest, all of the books on this list would have been worthy winners of the award, and probably would have been shoo-in's to win if they had been nominated in earlier decades.

Winner
Song of Time by Ian R. MacLeod

Shortlist
Anathem by Neal Stephenson
House of Suns by Alastair Reynolds
The Margarets by Sheri S. Tepper
Martin Martin's on the Other Side by Mark Wernham
The Quiet War by Paul J. McAuley

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2008
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2010

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

2008 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: You can often discern the concerns of an era by looking at the science fiction that its authors produce. The 2008 Clarke Awards were focused on militarism, as reflected in Richard Morgan's novel Black Man, terrorism as reflected in Ken MacLeod's novel The Execution Channel, and fear of nuclear holocaust, as reflected in Stephen Baxter's The H-Bomb Girl. The unifying theme of the genre fiction that appears on this year's ballot appears to be fear of our neighbors and fear of our own creations. Science fiction has always had an undercurrent of fear of technology and fear of the other, starting with Frankenstein, and that undercurrent rises and falls seemingly in time with the mood of the society around it, and in 2008, the mood of the society was decidedly fearful and that is reflected in the fiction that was produced.

Winner
Black Man by Richard Morgan

Shortlist
The Carhullan Army by Sarah Hall
The Execution Channel by Ken MacLeod
The H-Bomb Girl by Stephen Baxter
The Raw Shark Texts by Steven Hall
The Red Men by Matthew de Abaitua

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2007
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2009

Book Award Reviews     Home

Monday, December 31, 2007

2007 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo Piccadilly Circus in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: As I get to the more recent Clarke Award years, one would think that I would be more familiar with the authors and works that have been nominated. After all, these are books that have been published in the very recent past by authors who are often my contemporaries. And yet, in most cases I haven't read anything by the authors who are nominated for the recent awards, or if I have it has been short fiction that I haven't mentally connected to the author in question. The landscape of recent science fiction is so vast, that even someone like me, who reads books at a rate of more than a hundred per year, simply can't keep up with all of it.

Winner
Nova Swing by M. John Harrison

Shortlist
End of the World Blues by Jon Courtenay Grimwood
Gradisil by Adam Roberts
Hav by Jan Morris
Oh Pure and Radiant Heart by Lydia Millet
Streaking by Brian Stableford

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2006
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2008

Book Award Reviews     Home

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

2006 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Apollo West End Cinema in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: In 2006 Paul Kincaid made plans to step down as the administrator of the Clarke Awards, and was rewarded with an honorary award for his twenty years of dedicated service. Kincaid was, and is, an example of the people who work in the background of the science fiction and fantasy world to make the community what it is. Most people have never heard of him, or the myriad of other people who make the various awards, conventions, and other events function. They are rarely center stage, but rather put the authors, editors, and artists of the genre world in the spotlight. Kincaid, and the people who fill similar roles all across the science fiction world are what make the community more than merely a market where authors sell to consumers, but more of a collaborative feedback loop.

Winner
Air by Geoff Ryman

Shortlist
Accelerando by Charles Stross
Banner of Souls by Liz Williams
Learning the World by Ken MacLeod
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
Pushing Ice by Alastair Reynolds

Honorary Award
Paul Kincaid

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2005
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2007

Book Award Reviews     Home

Thursday, May 12, 2005

2005 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: English Heritage Lecture Theatre in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: We know that the 1987 Clarke Awards were handed out at Eastercon in Birmingham. We know that the 2005 Clarke Awards were bestowed in the English Heritage Theatre in London. In between those two events, there is almost no information at all concerning the location at which the Clarke Award ceremony was held. These sorts of gaps are not uncommon in our knowledge concerning the history of science fiction in general, and the history of science fiction awards in particular. Often times, the records concerning where awards ceremonies were held, who judged them, why particular award categories were added, changed, or removed, and even who the non-winning nominees were are simply lost. To a certain extent, this is to be expected, as the history of science fiction and science fiction awards is also a history that has been produced by volunteers. But it is also unfortunate, because it means that this information is lost and may never be recovered.

Winner
Iron Council by China Miéville

Shortlist
Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell
Market Forces by Richard Morgan
River of Gods by Ian McDonald
The System of the World by Neal Stephenson
The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2004
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2006

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, May 12, 2004

2004 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: United Kingdom.

Comments: In 2004 both Stephen Baxter and Gwyneth Jones were nominated for the Clarke Award. From a certain perspective, this is an inevitable development, as they are among the most-nominated authors for this award. On the other hand, having the two authors share the same ballot seems like the sort of thing that would cause a rift in the space-time continuum, as the combined weight of their nominations would simply be too much for reality to handle. leaving aside theories about the effect of multiple nominations on the fabric of our universe, this does touch on an interesting point about the Clarke Awards: While the award has a good track record of distributing the "wins" among numerous authors (there have only been three authors who have won the award more than once in its history), the nominee lists as a whole appear to be dominated by a cadre of seemingly perennial nominees.

Winner
Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson

Shortlist
Coalescent by Stephen Baxter
Darwin's Children by Greg Bear
Maul by Tricia Sullivan
Midnight Lamp by Gwyneth Jones
Pattern Recognition by William Gibson

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2003
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2005

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, December 31, 2003

2003 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: United Kingdom.

Comments: This is where I reveal what an inconsistent science fiction fan I am. I have not read any of the books that were nominated for the 2003 Clare Award. I am familiar with all of the authors, and have read books by most of them, in some cases a lot of books by them. But none of those books are the ones that were nominated for this year's edition of the Clarke Award. And this is what my long-term project to read all of the winners and nominees of the major genre fiction awards is about: Filling in these gaps and compiling a collection of reviews for this magnificent body of speculative literature.

Winner
The Separation by Christopher Priest

Shortlist
Kil'n People by David Brin
Light by M. John Harrison
The Scar by China Miéville
Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon
The Years of Rice and Salt by Kim Stanley Robinson

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2002
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2004

Book Award Reviews     Home

Tuesday, December 31, 2002

2002 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: United Kingdom.

Comments: Gwyneth Jones shares a common characteristic with Stephen Baxter: They have both been nominated for the Clarke Award seven times. Jones has one accomplishment that Baxter does not have; She has won a Clarke Award. Baxter has a distinction that Jones does not; I have read two of Baxter's books, and none of Jones'. I don't know why I haven't read any of Gwyneth Jones' books, but this is clearly an oversight that I need to rectify as soon as practicable.

Winner
Bold as Love by Gwyneth Jones

Shortlist
Fallen Dragon by Peter F. Hamilton
Mappa Mundi by Justina Robson
Pashazade: The First Arabesk by Jon Courtenay Grimwood
Passage by Connie Willis
The Secret of Life by Paul J. McAuley

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2001
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2003

Book Award Reviews     Home

Monday, December 31, 2001

2001 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: United Kingdom.

Comments: In 2001 China Miéville won his first Clarke Award for his brilliant novel Perdido Street Station. As Miéville is the most decorated author in the history of the Clarke Award, the only thing that is surprising about his win this year is that it took so long. Between 2001 and the present, Miéville would go on to win the Clarke Award two more times, once in 2005, and once in 2010. If he continues this pattern, and given his talent there's no reason to think he won't, then we should look for Miéville to also win the Clarke Award in 2015.

Winner
Perdido Street Station by China Miéville

Shortlist
Ash: A Secret History by Mary Gentle
Cosmonaut Keep by Ken MacLeod
Parable of the Talents by Octavia E. Butler
Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds
Salt by Adam Roberts

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2000
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2002

Book Award Reviews     Home