Monday, May 26, 2014

Musical Monday - Mama, Look Sharp by Stephen Nathan


1776 is a musical about the Second Continental Congress and the political maneuvering of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson as they ushered the Declaration of Independence into being adopted by the colonies via a unanimous vote. But in the background of the musical, there is a war going on, and we are reminded of this by the increasingly distraught dispatches from George Washington that are delivered to the Congress on a periodic basis.

And then, late in the production, the political movers and shakers leave the stage and the courier, who has been plodding through scene after scene to drop off his messages from the war, stops and talks with the clerk of the Congress. And then he sings about the war and its often forgotten costs. And this reminds us that history is not just great men and women striding across the world stage and going grand things. History is also mostly unremembered people undertaking the dangerous and difficult tasks that make the actions of the "great" men and women possible. And paying the price for doing so.

And remembering those people who struggled, and fought, and died to make the world we live in is what Memorial Day is really about, at least in my opinion. And remembering that so many of them died like Billy - alone and scared, calling out for their mother, or really, anyone. And this song, to me, captures that sacrifice, and why we should honor it, perfectly.

Previous Musical Monday: Game of Thrones Opening Credits
Subsequent Musical Monday: Dr. Who Theme by The Doubleclicks

Other Holiday Songs     Musical Monday Playlists

Stephen Nathan     Musical Monday     Home

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Book Blogger Hop May 23rd - May 29th: A Rubik's Cube Has 54 Colored Squares

Book Blogger Hop

Jen at Crazy for Books restarted her weekly Book Blogger Hop to help book bloggers connect with one another, but then couldn't continue, so she handed the hosting responsibilities off to Ramblings of a Coffee Addicted Writer. The only requirements to participate in the Hop are to write and link a post answering the weekly question and then visit other blogs that are also participating to see if you like their blog and would like to follow them.

This week Elizabeth of Silver's reviews asks (via Billy): Did you ever make a HUGE mistake when you posted a review? For example: Did you have the correct book title, but the wrong author in the blog post title? If so, how long until you found your mistake?

I can't recall making a mistake of that scale when posting a review. I frequently notice small errors that have crept into my posts, usually typos or missing words, and when I notice them I usually make corrections right away. But thus far I have managed to avoid misidentifying a book or an author in a blog title. I did temporarily conflate the author Alan E. Nourse with Andre Norton, mistaking Nourse for one of Norton's similar sounding pseudonyms, but that mistake only lasted for a few hours before I sorted it out and correctly identified Nourse as a separate author, and in any event, almost no one ever reads the author pages on this blog anyway. Other than that though, most of my posting errors have been trivial at most, and are typically fixed more or less as soon as I notice them.

Go to subsequent Book Blogger Hop: Sammy Hagar Can't Drive 55

Book Blogger Hop     Home

Friday, May 23, 2014

Follow Friday - In Roman Numerals, 159 Is CLIX


It's Friday again, and this means it's time for Follow Friday. There has been a slight change to the format, as now there are two Follow Friday hosts blogs and two Follow Friday Features Bloggers each week. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow both of the Follow My Book Blog Friday Hosts (Parajunkee and Alison Can Read) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow the two Featured Bloggers of the week - Except that this week there are no featured bloggers, because the selected bloggers apparently didn't respond to either Rachel or Alison.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
And now for the Follow Friday Question: Have you ever convinced someone to read a book, a series, or a whole genre? What book(s) and who was it? Did they like it?

I have. More than once. I have convinced people to read Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games series, David Brin's Uplift War series, Heinlein's juvenile novels, J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, Michael Moorcock's Chronicles of Corum, and several others. Some people liked my recommendations, others not so much.

Go to subsequent Follow Friday: You Can Use 160 Characters in an SMS Text Message

Follow Friday     Home

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

2014 Campbell Award Nominees

Location: Campbell Conference Awards Banquet at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kansas.

Comments: Ann Leckie's Ancillary Justice had already won both the Clarke and Nebula Awards, which one would think would have positioned the book as the front runner for winning the Campbell Award. But looking through the other nominees, one is struck by just how stiff the competition was in this year, as Leckie was going up against (among others) Nicola Griffith's Hild, Linda Nagata's The Red: First Light, Charles Stross' Neptune's Brood, and Paul J, McAuley's Evening's Empires. After a somewhat disappointing slate in 2013, the Campbell awards seem to have rebounded to offer a set of nominees that is both diverse and impressive.

Best Novel

Winner:
Strange Bodies by Marcel Theroux

Second Place:
Evening’s Empires by Paul J. McAuley

Third Place:
The Red: First Light by Linda Nagata

Finalists:
The Adjacent by Christopher Priest
Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie
The Circle by Dave Eggers
The Cusanus Game by Wolfgang Jeschke
The Disestablishment of Paradise by Phillip Mann
Hild by Nicola Griffith
Lexicon by Max Barry
Neptune’s Brood by Charles Stross
On the Steel Breeze by Alastair Reynolds
Proxima by Stephen Baxter
Shaman by Kim Stanley Robinson
We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler

Go to previous year's nominees: 2013
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2015

Book Award Reviews     Home

Monday, May 19, 2014

Musical Monday - Game of Thrones Opening Credits


So, there's this little known series on HBO based upon an obscure set of books that give a fantasy style retelling of the War of the Roses. I know what you are thinking: How could anyone possibly get excited about that. I mean, it is tedious and dull stuff with court politics, arranged marriages, debates over royal succession and arcane points of law, and so on. It is, in fact, almost as dry and boring as actual history.1

But the show does have a pretty good theme song for its opening credits.

1 Do I need to tag this as sarcasm?

Previous Musical Monday: Count to Ten by Paul & Storm
Subsequent Musical Monday: Mama, Look Sharp by Stephen Nathan

Game, Movie, and Television Music     Musical Monday     Home

Sunday, May 18, 2014

Book Blogger Hop May 16th - May 22nd: The Book "53 More Things to Do in Zero Gravity" Is Mentioned in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

Book Blogger Hop

Jen at Crazy for Books restarted her weekly Book Blogger Hop to help book bloggers connect with one another, but then couldn't continue, so she handed the hosting responsibilities off to Ramblings of a Coffee Addicted Writer. The only requirements to participate in the Hop are to write and link a post answering the weekly question and then visit other blogs that are also participating to see if you like their blog and would like to follow them.

This week RAnn of This That and the Other Thing asks (via Billy): How do you decide what blogs to follow?

1. I follow blogs that are featured on Parajunkee's Follow Friday meme. Because I figure it is only polite to follow the stated rules of the meme.
2. I follow blogs that follow me either through Parajunkee's Follow Friday meme or through this meme. I figure that if you are going to be nice enough to follow me, the least I can do is return the favor.
3. I follow blogs written by authors whose books I have enjoyed. I figure that if I enjoy their writing enough to buy and read their books, they are probably good enough at it that I will enjoy their blogs.
4. I follow blogs written by podcasters whose podcasts I enjoy listening to. I figure if you are interesting enough to produce a podcast that holds my attention, you are probably interesting enough to write a blog that holds my attention.
5. I follow blogs that seem interesting. Because I want to read interesting material about interesting things.

Go to previous Book Blogger Hop: Julius Ceasar Defeated Vercingetorix in 52 B.C.
Go to subsequent Book Blogger Hop: A Rubik's Cube Has 54 Colored Squares

Book Blogger Hop     Home

Friday, May 16, 2014

Follow Friday - There Are 158 Nations in the World Chess Federation


It's Friday again, and this means it's time for Follow Friday. There has been a slight change to the format, as now there are two Follow Friday hosts blogs and two Follow Friday Features Bloggers each week. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow both of the Follow My Book Blog Friday Hosts (Parajunkee and Alison Can Read) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow the two Featured Bloggers of the week - Except that this week there are no featured bloggers, because the selected bloggers apparently didn't respond to either Rachel or Alison.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
And now for the Follow Friday Question: Have you met a favorite author and have a picture? Share.

This has been something of a lost week for me. I was swamped with work from my day job and didn't get anything posted Tuesday, and then I was hit with some particularly bad news on Wednesday, which, when coupled with some interpersonal conflicts essentially consumed my writing time for that day. Then I got some disappointing news on Thursday which knocked me out of my rhythm as well. The short version is that this has been a lousy week and I'm glad it is over.

Me and Catherine Asaro
But on to the question: Here is a picture of me with Catherine Asaro, one of my favorite authors and the creator of the Saga of the Skolian Empire, a science fiction epic that spans more than a dozen novels and numerous other shorter pieces of writing. She has also written a number of near future science fiction novels such as The Veiled Web, Sunrise Alley, and Alpha. Asaro is known for injecting romance into her science fiction, and she does it quite well, producing very good books. I have actually met her several times, as she lives reasonably near me and we both attend many of the same local conventions, including the excellent literary science fiction convention CapClave. I've waxed lyrical over her before, so for now I will simply say that she is a fantastic author who is interesting and engaging in person, and who is also one of the kindest and most generous people I've met.

By the way, Catherine is currently doing a Kickstarter campaign to raise money for an audio book version of her anthology Aurora in Four Voices, which contains several stories set in the aforementioned Saga of the Skolian Empire. The anthology collects several of Asaro's novellas and short stories into one volume, including the Hugo- and Nebula-nominated story Aurora in Four Voices and the Nebula-winning story The Spacetime Pool. If you are interested, you can find the Kickstarter at this link.

Go to subsequent Follow Friday: In Roman Numerals, 159 Is CLIX

Follow Friday     Home

Monday, May 12, 2014

Musical Monday - Count to Ten by Paul & Storm


I love Schoolhouse Rock. I fell in love with it as kid when it was broadcast in between cartoons on Saturday mornings. I learned how legislation was passed by watching I'm Just a Bill. I learned about the 19th Amendment by watching Sufferin' til Suffrage. I cannot read the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution without hearing the tune of the Schoolhouse Rock song of the same name in my head. I still think of a verb as a superhero, and I'm pretty sure that the lessons the series taught me about the parts of speech helped me pass the Grammar Competency Exam in high school.

I have all of Schoolhouse Rock on DVD, and when I feel down, I pull it out, put it in the DVD-player, and let it play for hours. There are few things that are better than peppy songs about grammar, history, and science for picking you up. And no one does a better Schoolhouse Rock parody than Paul & Storm. They are able to take something as simple as counting to ten and craft a series of humorous and satirical verses that are somehow sophomoric, bitter, incisive, and hilarious all at the same time. Couple their lyrics with a crowd of nerds, and you get a magical result. A very dorky magical result.

Previous Musical Monday: The Imperial March
Subsequent Musical Monday: Game of Thrones Opening Credits

Paul & Storm     Musical Monday     Home

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Book Blogger Hop May 9th - May 15th: Julius Ceasar Defeated Vercingetorix in 52 B.C.

Book Blogger Hop

Jen at Crazy for Books restarted her weekly Book Blogger Hop to help book bloggers connect with one another, but then couldn't continue, so she handed the hosting responsibilities off to Ramblings of a Coffee Addicted Writer. The only requirements to participate in the Hop are to write and link a post answering the weekly question and then visit other blogs that are also participating to see if you like their blog and would like to follow them.

This week Elizabeth of Silver's Reviews asks (via Billy): When you enter a contest or request a book, how do you keep track of what the books are? Or perhaps you don't keep track and just remember what you entered or requested?

I don't enter contests for books and only request them on rare occasions. I have two reasons for this. Not only is my e-mail in-box already filled with so many requests for book reviews that I can't possibly say yes to all of them, I already have so many unread books that even if I didn't acquire a new book for a decade I probably wouldn't be able to catch up with my to-be-read pile. I don't go out and compete for or ask for books because I don't really need new books to keep me reading.


Book Blogger Hop     Home

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Follow Friday - "157 Riverside Avenue" Is an REO Speedwagon Song


It's Friday again, and this means it's time for Follow Friday. There has been a slight change to the format, as now there are two Follow Friday hosts blogs and two Follow Friday Features Bloggers each week. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow both of the Follow My Book Blog Friday Hosts (Parajunkee and Alison Can Read) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow the two Featured Bloggers of the week - Read Write All the Time and The Book Swarm.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
And now for the Follow Friday Question: What living author or authors would you like to have dinner with? (Try to think beyond J.K. Rowling.)

Follow Friday is a day late today. Yesterday I attended a library book sale and acquired several dozen books, so most of my day after that was spent cleaning and cataloging them rather than writing anything for the blog.

I'm going to pick three authors, listed here in no particular order, because I think having more than one author at the table would help engender interesting conversation. The three authors I would pick are:

Ursula K. Le Guin: My first choice for a dinner companion would be Ursula K. Le Guin. No one who reads this blog will be surprised at my deep and abiding love for Le Guin and her work. She is, in my opinion, one of the greatest science fiction authors, and the best female science fiction author of all time. I have loved her fiction since I first opened my copy of A Wizard of Earthsea as a boy. Further, by all accounts she is as brilliant, profound, and witty in person as she is in her writing, which would make her an incredibly interesting and fascinating dinner companion.

John Scalzi: My second dinner companion would be the hilarious and brilliant John Scalzi, who is a fantastic science fiction author with several novels under his belt, a prolific blogger whose blog Whatever has been a going concern for almost two decades, and a generally sharp and incisively humorous guy. Although I have never met him in person, I can say with confidence that if his real life persona is half as engaging as his online persona is, then an evening with Scalzi would be an experience not to be missed.

Catherine Asaro: The only one of the three authors listed here who I have actually met, Catherine Asaro is almost a force of nature by herself. She is a fantastic author, a Harvard educated physicist, a dancer, and a singer. I am firmly convinced that no matter what artistic or professional endeavor she decided to take up, she'd be brilliant at it. Her wide ranging interests and accomplishments would make her a stellar dinner companion, and having seen her on several panels at science fiction conventions, if the conversation ever got stuck in a lull, she'd be able to prod things along and get the discussion going again.

As an aside, Catherine is currently doing a Kickstarter campaign to raise money for an audio book version of her anthology Aurora in Four Voices. The anthology collects several of Asaro's novellas and short stories into one volume, including the Hugo- and Nebula-nominated story Aurora in Four Voices and the Nebula-winning story The Spacetime Pool. If you are interested, you can find the Kickstarter at this link.


Follow Friday     Home

Thursday, May 8, 2014

2014 Clarke Award Nominees

Location: Sci-Fi London at the Stratford Picturehouse in London, United Kingdom.

Comments: To the surprise of almost no one, Anne Leckie won the 2014 Clarke Award with her novel Ancillary Justice, which also looks to be the front runner for the Hugo Award this year. The only remotely surprising thing is the shift away from the all-male slate of the 2013 Clarke Awards to this more balanced ballot. But this raises the question of why this British award has moved to having a diverse array of interesting books covering a wide variety of science fiction topics, while the flagship American-oriented award seem to have been hijacked by right-wing writers venting their venom on women and minorities while fondling their penis-replacing firearms. If this persists for more than a year or two, the central locus of science fiction may very well move out of the United States and to the United Kingdom, or maybe even Australia.

Winner
Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie

Shortlist
The Adjacent by Christopher Priest
The Disestablishment of Paradise by Phillip Mann
God's War by Kameron Hurley
The Machine by James Smythe
Nexus by Ramez Naam

What Are the Arthur C. Clarke Awards?

Go to previous year's nominees: 2013
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2015

Book Award Reviews     Home

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Review - Requiem of the Human Soul by Jeremy Lent


Short review: "Primal" humanity is up for extinction by its genetically altered descendants in a world that seems to have forgotten the distinction between negligence and intentional harm, so the only thing that can save us is the nebulous mushiness of the human soul.

Haiku
In the near future
Science is the enemy
For no real reason

Disclosure: I received this book as part of the LibraryThing Member Giveaway program. Some people think this may bias a reviewer so I am making sure to put this information up front. I don't think it biases my reviews, but I'll let others be the judge of that.

Full review: Requiem of the Human Soul is the first science fiction book I have read in which science is the villain. When I say "science is the villain", I don't mean science gone awry (as the case with so many Crichton novels), or even that there is a mad scientists using his super science powers to create mutants. Rather, I mean that according to the book the portion of the human brain that allows for the rational thought process that results in science is the problem. Science, and the resulting modern world, is apparently killing the human soul.

The plot of the book is fairly simple. Genetically engineered humans (designer humans, or d-humans) have become the dominant majority in the world, with unmodified humans (primals) making up a significant minority and forming a permanent underclass. The UN, which is a meaningful force in the fictitious future of the story, has exclusive authority to deal with the "primals" (via the UN agency known as UNAPS, or the UN Authority for the Primal Species). The viewpoint character of the story is Eusebio, a primal who is abducted by UN investigators to participate in the proposal for extinction of primal species (PEPS) hearings with Naomi, a "d-3 human" and primal rights activist serving as his counsel, while Harry Shields, another d-3 human, serves as prosecutor. After brushing through some fairly concrete objections to PEPS, the hearings get to The Point of the Book, which is that destroying the primal species will be a massive crime because doing so will run the risk of extinguishing the human soul. This seems like an awful thin thread to hang the fate of humanity on, so the author introduces an alternative, the Rejectionist activist Yusef, who offers Eusebio the option of destroying New York to strike a blow for primal rights. The book meanders along for most of its length until the very end, when a couple of plot twists effectively invalidate everything that happened in the book, and leave the reader wondering why the UN went through the entire charade.

I believe there is a tendency among writers who have not dealt with science fiction (and fantasy for that matter) before to think that science fiction is easy. In fact, I think writing good science fiction is much more difficult than writing "straight" fiction because the author, in addition to providing interesting characters and a good story, must also establish the fictitious backdrop of the story. This usually requires what is known in science fiction circles as the "infodump", and mastering the art of the infodump is one of the key elements of making a science fiction writer good. A true master will establish elements without making it a big deal (for example, Heinlein's famous line "the door dilated"), which others use more clumsy methods (the "as you know Bob" form of exposition). Unfortunately, a lot of the background in Requiem for the Human Soul is given as clumsy infodumps. The characters of Naomi and Yusef exist in large part to dump information on Eusebio, and by doing so, dump it on the reader. One annoying way this is done is by bringing up a topic Eusebio (who has lived a sheltered life outside the mass media of the larger world) knows nothing about, and then telling him about it. But the typical method of conveying the information is not for Eusebio to have a conversation with the infodumper, but rather for Eusebio to report what he was told, for example:

"GALT, Yusef explained, had presented a zero-sum game to the world: On the one hand you could have continual war and human suffering; on the other hand, you could have global peace only by giving up the spiritual existence of life - the most important aspect of mankind's existence. But the Rejectionists believed genetic engineering could optimize the spiritual aspects of human beings, and in doing so, tolerance and love for others would naturally follow."

So, we don't get the conversation in which this information is imparted, instead we get a very didactic and heavy-handed retelling of what was said. This crops up several times in the book, we are told what a conversation was about without the messy bother of the actual conversation. In my opinion, this is a very weak way to convey information. (As a side note, why do I think it is not an accident that the "Global Arms Limitation Treaty" acronym "GALT" reminds one of an Ayn Rand protagonist).

The second major way that infodumps are done in the book is via "interludes" in which the narrative is set aside for a bit in order to jump back in time to characters from the past, such as the founders of the Humanists (primals who reject genetic engineering on the basis that it is damaging to the human soul), or newspaper articles on important historical events. The featured characters from the past share the same conversational foibles as the ones in the up-to-date story line do, but the newspaper articles come off as a the equivalent to a feature piece in a newspaper today describing how the internet works. While reading them, one wonders why the details of trips to offshore genetic engineering clinics would include the description of what (by the time the article is supposed to have been published) would have been the equivalent of describing how a telephone works today.

One other annoying thing about the book is that it seems like the author, to a certain extent, is simply not playing fair with the narrative. By this I mean that it is clear that he wants Eusebio to be left with no defense against the PEPS proposal save a defense of the human soul, and in the rush to get there, he brushes aside some fairly rational arguments against it. The author uses the crimes of primal humanity against nature: The destruction of natural habitat and over-hunting and so on, leading to the extinction of species as evidence that the primals are only being hypocritical when they argue against the PEPS proposal. But this logic train has enormous holes in it that any competent lawyer could drive trucks though. Naomi, for a superior, genetically engineered d-human, seems to be a fairly incompetent counsel since she never once points out that this argument argues for a moral and legal equivalence between mere negligence and intentional extermination. One also wonders why she never points out that the d-humans, who argue that they are by reason of their genetics, morally superior, rely upon an argument that places them in an equivalent position to the supposedly morally inferior primals they propose to eliminate (not that they are equivalent, as they propose to do with intent what primals did via negligence). Never mind that the d-humans in the story don't seem to show much in the way of superior moral behavior, they assert that they do, and yet the entire argument in favor of PEPS rests on an equivalence with the very group they claim is morally inferior. In the hearing, Eusebio sits in a neurographic chair that monitors his brain for truthfulness, and yet neither the prosecutor or the defense counsel do. One wonders why Eusebio didn't object to this: If he is required to tell the truth and they will monitor him to ensure that he does, why is the prosecutor free to lie if he wants to? It is shown that the downtrodden nature of the primals is, in large part, due to the policies enforced by UNAPS and GALT, and said downtrodden nature is used to help justify PEPS. The stunning hypocrisy of this stance is never brought into the hearing, merely commented upon by Eusebio outside the hearing. Once again, Naomi seems to be quite incompetent. Finally, given that there are supposed to be 7 billion d-humans and 3 billion primals at the time of the story, one presumes that the bulk of the habitable area of the Earth is occupied by d-humans, that same area that was the native habitat the primals are accused of destroying. Yet the argument that d-human society is hypocritical in that it reaps the benefits of the ecological devastation they lay at the primals' feet while at the same time decrying it is brushed aside in a perfunctory manner. I understand that Lent wanted to get to The Point of the story and talk about the human soul, but not bothering to deal with what should have been some very substantial issues in anything but the most perfunctory manner simply makes the book less effective than it could have been.

Further, a lot of the science elements of the story are simply unconvincing, leaving the reader with huge questions. The PEPS proposal is to be implemented by disbursing "Isotope 909" which will make primals partially sterile. The question that occurs to the scientifically inclined reader is "isotope of what?", since an isotope is an atom of the same chemical element that has a different atomic mass. Which chemical element makes up "Isotope 909" (or the other one mentioned in the story, "Isotope 919")? Is it Vanadium? Yttrium? Some other element? Which element would have an isotope with an atomic mass of 909 (or 919) anyway? That's about 615 grams per mole more than the mass of Ununoctium, which is pretty unlikely, and all of the elements with that high of an atomic number are horrendously toxic to everyone, not just pregnant women, so the whole "isotope" business just makes no sense. I figure that what Lent must mean is something like "Compound 909", which is what would make sense in the story, but when an author of a science fiction story gets basic science terminology wrong, it seriously damages the rest of the story by pulling the reader out of the narrative flow.

Another critical element to the story is the cancer related death of Eusebio's wife, which could have been cured, but it is explained, doing so would have been too expensive. Her form of cancer is rare in the modern world, and hence the special machines that could have synthesized a protein that would eat the cancerous cells (something I'm not even sure that a protein could plausibly do) are rare and must be imported at prohibitive expense. But that doesn't make much sense. A protein is merely a collection of amino acids in a particular sequence. Any process by which one could create one protein could probably pretty easily be modified to create a different one, which makes the whole subplot less than scientifically plausible. Again, this pulls one out of the narrative and damages the science credibility of the story.

Another question that arises in the story is that the societal fall out from rampant global warming forms a critical element of the back story of the setting (driving the handover of military power to the UN, and the creation of GALT), but the d-human society shown consumes massive quantities of energy, even to the point of running a huge project to revive (and control in minute detail) the African savanna. Where does this massive volume of energy come from? How is it generated without creating a huge amount of global warming? This question, like many others, is simply unaddressed.

One important science element that seemed quite odd was the distinction between "d-humans" and primals, which is elevated in the book to the level of speciation. Much is made of the fact that primals share 99.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees, while only 99.3% of their DNA with d-humans (given that there are d-1, d-2, d-3 and soon to be d-4 humans, one wonders how such a specific percentage is arrived at). However, given that most of the d-human changes were originally driven by taking some superlative primal and copying their genetic code (there is a long digression about this), one wonders how this is even possible. The d-process, as described in the book, is about modifying existing genes, not about creating, removing, or adding genes, and one wonders if the d-humans could in fact, vary from primal humans by the 15 million or so base pairs required to exist in d-humans but not primals to make the d-humans genetically that different. One comes away from this comparison wondering just how much research on genetic engineering was done in the background for the book.

This DNA difference is used in the book by d-humans to assert that primals are a different species. One unanswered question is whether d-humans are unable to interbreed with primals (the classic definition of speciation), since, of course, humans cannot interbreed with chimpanzees. Once again, this is a glaring, and unanswered question. And, one question raised by the possibility of speciation and completely ignored is: What duty does one sentient species owe to another? Apparently the d-humans are convinced that the primals are a different species (many call them "chimps"), and the mandatory moral modifications that are supposed to make d-humans less doctrinal and less aggressive don't seem to prevent them from adopting a clannish, bigoted, and racist attitude towards primals. Nor do the modifications seem to prevent the d-humans from blasting away at primals quite violently. I'm not sure if we are supposed to conclude that the moral modifications are in fact a sham and the d-humans are hypocrites on this score, or that the author simply didn't think through the implications of his own setting. Either way, it is another plot element that just doesn't hold up.

But, one might say, these are just a stylistic quibbles. What about the great story? What about the struggle to save the human soul? After all, this is The Point of the book. Well, even here there are problems, and they stem from some flawed ideas about science. The whole idea of the human soul in the book revolves around something called the "Schumacher Smudge", named after two time Nobel Prize winning scientist Julius Schumacher. When doing neurographic imaging of the human brain, Schumacher noticed a "smudge" on the images. This "smudge" is identified by him as evidence of the soul (based on almost nothing). After some personal tragedy, Schumacher bums around the third world living a primitive utopian existence and then returns to write his "masterpiece" On Being Human in which he explains that the smudge is the human soul, and that the prefrontal cortex and the style of thinking that is driven by that part of the brain has suppressed the more primitive parts of the brain and the "spiritual thinking". Further, the d-humans he had imaged didn't seem to have the smudge, and thus genetic engineering should be discontinued to avoid possible damage to the human soul. The story says that there was a huge negative reaction to his book from religious authorities and the scientific community, which seems to be intended to demonstrate the narrow-mindedness of both communities. However, I can not only understand the negative reaction of the scientific community, I would expect it, since as described the book appears to be nothing more than random speculation. Schumacher's idea that the smudge is the human soul appears to be based on nothing at all. Effectively, Schumacher supposedly thought that his status as a two time Nobel Prize winner would carry the day. But argument by authority doesn't work in the scientific community, and Schumacher would be expected to know that. In point of fact, those who attempt to make scientific arguments from authority are usually roundly (and rightly) ridiculed. Rather than making him out to be a genius, Schumacher's story makes him out to be something of a dimwit. The evidence supplied for the thesis of On Being Human seems as insubstantial as the evidence linking themerisol with autism, making Schumacher seem to be the Jenny McCarthy of his day.

In any event, Schumacher is killed for his ideas, and his close associates get together and found the Humanist movement dedicated to avoiding genetic engineering in order to prevent possible damage to the human soul. The odd thing is that they don't appear to spend any time working with neurographic engineering and studying the smudge to figure out if it is actually the human soul. Nor do they study primal humans and d-humans to determine why one has the smudge and the other apparently does not. Instead, the Humanist community descends into what seems to be an endless round of mystical mumbo-jumbo as they seek to get in touch with their primitive roots. The Humanist communities also, for some reason, cut themselves off from each other, and contact with the outside world, exclusively studying things like Australian Aboriginal dream time experiences and Native American ghost dance ceremonies and the like. It is all very "New Age" quasi-philosophy, seeking the "ancient wisdom" rather than actually studying the evidence of the human soul. Rather than sympathizing with the primal Humanists, one ends up holding them in contempt for not bothering to follow up and actually figure out if the claims of their spiritual founder actually held water.

The book makes a few stabs at substantiating what it means by the human soul, including scenes in which Eusebio experiences his "vision quest" and forms a connection with his totem tree and a "connection of souls" during sex between Eusebio and the love of his life Sarah. But as interesting as these spiritual experiences are, can they really serve as evidence of a special soul? Accepting them at face value doesn't help, as Sam Harris has pointed out, it is quite possible to experience spiritually uplifting moments without resorting to explaining them by means of  some sort of transcendent spirit or soul. One question that has to be asked (since a theme of the book is that modern life and Western culture is destroying the human soul) is how is it that people living in modern societies seem to have these sorts of spiritual experiences all the time?

More saliently, one has to seriously question the idea that primitive societies lived in harmony with nature. The Australian Aborigines are referenced several times, as are the Native Americans, but the evidence available concerning Australian and North/South American prehistory is that when humans reached those continents they immediately hunted all the large animals to extinction. Mayan civilization is thought to have fallen apart due to ecological disaster following overuse of the land. Tribal society in Indonesia seems to be brutally violent and destructive (see the description of this society in Guns, Germs, and Steel). These pieces of evidence seem somewhat at odds with the idea that primitive societies are based upon harmony with the world, and offer a calming spiritual alternative to the modern world. Even if it were true, giving up the benefits of modern society seems like an awfully large sacrifice for the alleged benefits of the spiritual primitive societies.

And one wonders how the idea that d-humans have no soul even works. The d-humans are by and large humans who have been modified to resemble and have the attributes of famous and talented people. I kept wondering if the point of the book was that top NFL players don't have souls? Or that Bill Gates has no soul? Or Scarlett Johanssen? That they are closer to having no soul than, say me, or you? It just doesn't seem to make any sense at all. The d-human PEPS prosecutor also goes on at length about how the primals themselves helped destroy the human soul when Western civilization (apparently dominated by the tyranny of the prefrontal cortex) trampled upon the culture of more primitive indigenous peoples like the Australian Aborigines and Native Americans. What goes unremarked upon is that if the Schumacher smudge is actually evidence of the human soul, such trampling didn't actually destroy it.

As a side note, one of the fictitious articles about d-babies talks about the "top NFL player's genetic array" as an option. How is this determined? Is the top football player a running back? A quarterback? A lineman? A safety? All have different skill sets and presumably different genetic arrays. Which one is the "top player", can this be determined? Does everyone want a rifle arm? Or giant behemoth who can knock people off the line? What genetic traits are actually universally desirable? It is this sort of bald statement that makes one pause. Statements are made that just don't seem to hold up and then expected to do so without any backing at all. One thing that seems to be universally useful would be the disease screening (which the Humanists reject, making them the future equivalent of people who refuse to vaccinate their children), and it is this sort of thing that, to me, makes the d-human society one so very attractive. On the one hand we have the Humanist obsession with the vague implications of a smudge that is claimed to be a soul (but never proven to be as far as I can tell), and on the other the elimination of diseases like cancer and the extension of the human lifespan through genetic manipulation. I know which society I find more attractive, and it isn't the one that thinks smoking in a wigwam is spiritually uplifting enough to turn its back on modern medicine. Even before the twist ending (see below), I found myself unsympathetic to the Humanists and their stance that amounts, in my view, to something akin to child abuse.

Despite the build up, the Yusef subplot ends up amounting to not much. One wonders to begin with how blowing up New York would advance the cause of the primals, rather than simply causing the immediate destruction of the primals as a threat. (For that matter, one wonders why the destruction of Columbus caused the U.S. to kowtow to the CARGI legal proceedings, given that the book was written after 9/11, it seems unreasonable to think that a terrorist attack would provoke much of anything but the attacked power lashing out in response). The Rejectionists are too insubstantial a movement in the story to make their claims particularly interesting: Eusebio due to his self-imposed isolation from the modern world knows nothing about them, and we get very little other than propaganda from either side. In the end, the nuclear bomb subplot seems tacked on, a sort of false attempt to add some action to a story that didn't really need it.

But that's a minor problem. The major problem is that the PEPS hearing is a sham, as is all the moaning about the human soul. The PEPS hearing was merely a ruse in order to get Eusebio into the neurographic chair, not to monitor his truthfulness, but to get an image of the human soul. The PEPS proposal is going to be implemented regardless, and both Naomi and Harry had concocted this hearing in order to preserve a record of the human soul so that future generations of d-humans could have it genetically implanted in their DNA. The problem with this is that it is a stupid way to get an image of a primal human soul. It is also needlessly cruel (remember, d-humans are supposed to be superior morally). Eusebio is removed from his home with no notice, and none of his friends, family, or neighbors know where he is, and because he knows about the PEPS proposal, he will never be allowed to communicate with them again. One has to think that if all Naomi and Harry wanted was a neurographic image of the human soul they simply could have asked for a couple of primal test subjects without the rigamarole of the hearing process and without having to abruptly and permanently separate them from their entire family. Maybe this is supposed to be a commentary on how humans treat test animals, but if so, it is very subtle. The PEPS hearing sham also ends up giving them exactly one example of a human soul, which seems fairly short-sighted to me, whereas some sort of research project would have given them dozens if not hundreds of examples to work with.

An even bigger problem is that, in the very last pages of the book, it is revealed that there is a "prefrontal cortex" soul called the "infinite soul". Once again, this is the author not really playing fair with the reader, as in the old saying: If you have a gun in the first act, it must be used in the third; but the converse is true as well, if a gun is used in the third act, it should show up in the first. The "infinite soul" is simply lobbed into the narrative from left field, with no real foundation at all. The Schumacher smudge is defined as the "earthly soul", and humans share this with all animals. The infinite soul is shared by primals and d-humans. In other words, what makes humans uniquely human is not the Schumacher smudge at all, but rather something that they share with d-humans. This seems to invalidate the entire premise of the book - the primitive soul isn't what makes a human a human. And it isn't threatened by the genetic engineering of humanity, or the rise of the d-humans. What makes a human a human, as opposed to any other animal, is exactly what Lent spent the entire 300 prior pages saying was destroying humanity: The tyranny of the prefrontal cortex. And Lent closes his story by going back and having Eusebio wax poetic about Chief Joseph and how the human soul will be lost and reborn as a result of the neurographic imaging. Whether this is simply Eusebio missing the obvious conclusion to be drawn from this bit of information, or Lent simply ignoring the implications of his own setting again is unclear. In any event, one ends up not feeling very sympathetic towards Naomi or Eusebio (for different reasons), and not really lamenting the impending doom of the primals (which I think is not the reaction Lent was hoping to evoke).

This could have been a much better book, but the lack of willingness of the author to work through the implications of his own setting hampers it significantly. The apparent lack of scientific knowledge also hurts the story, since in what reads like a hard science fiction story, especially a near future science fiction story, you have to at least get the science kind of in the ballpark of plausible. Not even the future history seems particularly compelling, as it is more or less a laundry list of scary shibboleths: Global warming will cause massive wars over water, third world countries will sue the first world for compensation for imperialism, the government will begin monitoring everyone with implanted microchips, and so on and so forth. In the end though, what unravels the story is the twist ending that throws in random elements from left field, exposes the supposedly smart d-humans as idiots, and invalidates everything about the story that went before.

Jeremy Lent     Book Reviews A-Z     Home

Monday, May 5, 2014

Musical Monday - The Imperial March


Yesterday was May 4th, also known as Star Wars Day. Today is May 5th, which is the Revenge of the Fifth, so it seems appropriate to make today's Musical Monday selection my favorite piece of music from the Star Wars series: The Imperial March.

My favorite character from Star Wars has always been Darth Vader1. Even as a kid first watching the movies in the theater, I knew that Vader was the best character in the movie, much better than the whiny Luke, the cynical Han, or the distracted Leia. And don't get me started on the dishonest duo of Kenobi and Yoda. They might have been the heroes of the story, but Vader was clearly the star. His casual, unhurried, and almost placid evil was compelling in a way no other villain I had seen before had been. Vader made villainy almost a casual affair, striding through the movies with uncaring self-assurance.

And this piece of music, first heard in The Empire Strikes Back, fits Vader's personality perfectly. Steady. Implacable. Filled with power. And it is the music that I hear in my head whenever I walk around.

1 Vader from Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi, and Rogue One, which, along with The Force Awakens are the only five Star Wars movies that have ever been made. Perhaps someday someone might make some prequels telling us Vader's back story. It hasn't happened yet, but it might.

Subsequent Musical Monday: Count to Ten by Paul & Storm

Other Holiday Songs     Musical Monday Playlists

Game, Movie, and Television Music     Musical Monday     Home

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Book Blogger Hop May 2nd - May 8th: "Fifty-One Tales" Is a Collection of Short Stories by Lord Dunsany

Book Blogger Hop

Jen at Crazy for Books restarted her weekly Book Blogger Hop to help book bloggers connect with one another, but then couldn't continue, so she handed the hosting responsibilities off to Ramblings of a Coffee Addicted Writer. The only requirements to participate in the Hop are to write and link a post answering the weekly question and then visit other blogs that are also participating to see if you like their blog and would like to follow them.

This week Elizabeth of Silver's Reviews asks (via Billy): When you receive a book in the mail or from UPS, do you immediately catalog it or leave the books stacked up until the week is up and then catalog them?

I try to catalog books as soon as possible, mostly so they don't get misplaced and forgotten. This means that when I receive a book through the mail (or on the rare occasion when I receive a book via UPS), that book is almost always cataloged by the end of that day. First I enter the book into an Excel spreadsheet that I use to keep track of my books, and then I enter the book into LibraryThing so I can tag it with the various labels I use to keep track of the books in my collection. At that point I can then physically move the book to its home in my library, usually to sit temporarily on one of my various "to-read" shelves until they get read and reviewed.

Go to subsequent Book Blogger Hop: Julius Ceasar Defeated Vercingetorix in 52 B.C.

Book Blogger Hop     Home

Friday, May 2, 2014

Follow Friday - The Original Twilight Zone Television Show Ran for 156 Episodes


It's Friday again, and this means it's time for Follow Friday. There has been a slight change to the format, as now there are two Follow Friday hosts blogs and two Follow Friday Features Bloggers each week. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow both of the Follow My Book Blog Friday Hosts (Parajunkee and Alison Can Read) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow the two Featured Bloggers of the week - Books, Movies, Reviews. Oh My! and Journey Through Fiction.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
And now for the Follow Friday Question: Share! Tell us about one of your hobbies that is NOT reading.

My most significant hobby other than reading is gaming. And by gaming I mean tabletop gaming - both tabletop board gaming and tabletop role-playing gaming. I am currently the game master for a regular role-playing campaign, specifically a Dungeons & Dragons campaign. The redhead and I host regular gatherings of our friends for board gaming days where we play games like Settlers of Catan, Firefly, Carcasonne, Ticket to Ride, 7 Wonders, Galactic Emperor, Pandemic, Shadows Over Camelot, Small World, Cards Against Humanity, and many others. The redhead and I went to Gen Con last year, a convention dubbed "the best four days in gaming", and will be going again this year.

Tabletop gaming is a fantastic social hobby, because you need other people to do it. Although there are a handful of board games (and at least one role-playing game I know of) that one can play solo, you usually need to have at least two, and often more people to play a tabletop game. So you get something like three to six friends together, put a board game or a collection of role-playing books in front of them, and then the fun begins. I understand that people who don't play games can have social lives, but I'm not sure how.

Go to subsequent Follow Friday: "157 Riverside Avenue" Is an REO Speedwagon Song

Follow Friday     Home

Thursday, May 1, 2014

2014 Nebula Award Nominees

Location: San Jose, California

Comments: As the Nebula Award nominating process is much less subject to the kind of political manipulation that tainted the 2014 Hugo Awards, the resulting slate of nominees is a much more solid crop than the wildly uneven Hugo ballot. And among the Nebula nominees is Charles E. Gannon's novel Fire with Fire. This is notable because Gannon's novel was published by Baen books, proving that in a fair selection process, a Baen author can be nominated for awards. This simple fact pretty much demolishes the oft-repeated whine heard from Baen authors like Larry Correia that there is some sort of cabal preventing them from getting their just recognition in the awards arena. But sadly for them, the truth is that there is no conspiracy that keeps them from putting trophies on their shelves. The fact is, their books just aren't particularly noteworthy.

Sure, Correia sells a lot of books, as do many other Baen authors. But so does Dan Brown, and no one thinks he should be getting any literary awards. Simply put, when Baen authors write good books, such as Fire with Fire, they get nominated for awards. When they write mediocre material, like the entirety of Correia's ouevre, they don't. And the hard truth is that by wheedling his way into a Hugo nomination, Correia has reduced his standing as an author and damaged what limited credibility he may have had, possibly permanently. Gannon, on this other hand, has enhanced his stature. The answer to the question "how do you get nominated for awards" is simple: You write stories that are worthy of awards. To date, Correia and his buddies haven't done that.

Best Novel

Winner:
Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie

Other Nominees:
Fire with Fire by Charles E. Gannon
The Golem and the Jinni by Helene Wecker
Hild by Nicola Griffith
The Ocean at the End of the Lane by Neil Gaiman
The Red: First Light by Linda Nagata
A Stranger in Olondria by Sofia Samatar
We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler

Best Novella

Winner:
The Weight of Sunrise by Vylar Kaftan

Other Nominees:
Annabel Lee by Nancy Kress
Burning Girls by Veronica Schanoes
Six-Gun Snow White by Catherynne M. Valente
Trial of the Century by Lawrence M. Schoen
Wakulla Springs by Andy Duncan and Ellen Klages

Best Novelette

Winner:
The Waiting Stars by Aliette de Bodard

Other Nominees:
In Joy, Knowing the Abyss Behind by Sarah Pinsker
The Litagation Master and the Monkey King by Ken Liu
Paranormal Romance by Christopher Barzak
Pearl Rehabilitative Colony for Ungrateful Daughters by Henry Lien
They Shall Salt the Earth with Seeds of Glass by Alaya Dawn Johnson

Best Short Story

Winner:
If You Were a Dinosaur, My Love by Rachel Swirsky (reviewed in 2014 Hugo Voting - Best Short Story)

Other Nominees:
Alive, Alive Oh by Sylvia Spruck Wrigley
Selected Program Notes from the Retrospective Exhibition of Theresa Rosenberg Latimer by Kenneth Schneyer
Selkie Stories Are for Losers by Sofia Samatar (reviewed in 2014 Hugo Voting - Best Short Story)
The Sounds of Old Earth by Matthew Kressel

Ray Bradbury Award

Winner:
Gravity directed by Alfonso Cuarón; written by Alfonso Cuarón and Jonás Cuarón

Other Nominees:
Doctor Who: The Day of the Doctor directed by Nick Hurran; written by Steven Moffat
Europa Report directed by Sebastián Cordero; written by Philip Gelatt
Her directed and written by Spike Jonze
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire directed by Francis Lawrence; written by Simon Beaufoy and Michael de Bruyn
Pacific Rim directed by Guillermo del Toro; written by Travis Beacham and Guillermo del Toro

Andre Norton Award

Winner:
Sister Mine by Nalo Hopkinson

Other Nominees:
The Coldest Girl in Coldtown by Holly Black
A Corner of White by Jaclyn Moriarty
Hero by Alethea Kontis
September Girls by Bennett Madison
The Summer Prince by Alaya Dawn Johnson
When We Wake by Karen Healey

Go to previous year's nominees: 2013
Go to subsequent year's nominees: 2015

Book Award Reviews     Home