Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Review - Cathouse: She's Got Game (Episode 5)


Short review: A disjointed episode that covers a pile of random topics.

Haiku
To play the sex game
Some Bunnies get breast implants
Others use e-mail

Full review: Every television show seems condemned to have episodes in which all of the elements of a good show are there, but somehow, the sum of all the parts adds up to a fairly forgettable experience. For Cathouse, the fifth episode titled She's Got Game appears to be that episode. Everything seems to be in place to deliver a solid episode, but there is just no unifying thread that ties this particular episode together. To a certain extent, She's Got Game seems to have been the result of HBO finding a bunch of extra footage that wouldn't fit into other episodes, and throwing it together to fill out a half an hour. Ostensibly the episode is about "game", that combination of sex appeal, personality, and negotiating skills that Bunnies use to persuade men to choose them and then spend lots of money. But as pretty much everything the Bunnies do at the Bunny Ranch is directed to this end, this isn't really a separate topic so much as it is all topics, which results in an unfocused and sloppy episode. The episode also suffers from having what one could term "off-brand" Bunnies front and center - ladies are featured in this episode who primarily appear in the background in most other episodes. And what this makes clear is that there is more to being an interesting reality television character than simply getting in front of the camera. Whether one likes Isabella Soprano, Danielle, or Air Force Amy, or not, they make for good television. On the other hand, Deanna, Felicia, and Jaime Sweet simply do not. I'm sure the latter three are all very likable women and probably good at their actual jobs, but they just aren't good at television. I'll also note that this is the second consecutive episode that has a criminal lack of appearances by Karla.

The episode opens up promisingly, showing Isabella Soprano returning to the Bunny Ranch after an absence (although the exact length of the absence is not specified). This leads to Suzette pointing out that women come and go at the Bunny Ranch on a regular basis. In a brief interview montage, Daisy makes this point more explicitly "I come and go all the time, this is not a lock down house". Felicia says that she is herself at home, and a sexy and beautiful fantasy woman at the Bunny Ranch. Isabella likens being at the Bunny Ranch to being like a princess - since when she is there she gets dressed up, gets her hair done, takes care of her make-up and so on. In effect, for the working girls, it seems that every day at the Bunny Ranch is "date night", because every night they are there they are pretty much hoping for a date. Or three. Amy Andersinn caps off the discussion by trotting out the somewhat overused "sorority house" metaphor - to which I can only say that all the sorority houses I was even passingly familiar with banned men in any of the non-public areas of the house, which probably wouldn't work very well for the Bunnies.

I'll digress for a bit here and expand upon Daisy's comment before climbing on a soap box for a bit. While the Moonlite Bunny Ranch is, at this point, the most famous legal brothel in Nevada, it is not the only one (it isn't even the only one owned by Dennis Hof). Apparently, at many other brothels, when women come to work at them, they are required to spend their entire working shift ranging from days to weeks living at the brothel and never leaving the premises, with some fairly weak rationales extended justifying this practice. I'll note that this level of control exerted over the working conditions of the women seems quite inconsistent with the claim that they are "independent contractors" rather than employees. Put simply, a business simply cannot maintain that their workforce is made up of independent contractors while simultaneously imposing stringent work conditions upon them. As Daisy points out, the Moonlite Bunny Ranch is not a "lockdown house", and apparently has not been one for many years. Given that the Moonlite Bunny Ranch is, at this point, presumably the most successful legal brothel in Nevada (and likely, the most desirable to work at), it seems difficult to understand how the owners of the various other bordellos are able to continue to impose lock down conditions until one realizes that they have a government enforced oligopoly that keeps out competition. Each county in Nevada that licenses brothels only permits a very limited number, effectively giving the owners who hold licenses freedom from any real competition. In short, when the government shields you from competition, you can get away with treating people poorly via your business practices and it simply won't hurt you financially. In a less regulated market, Dennis' "no lockdown" model would have likely been adopted by a dozen startup houses as a means to entice the best money making women to come work for them, and the older houses would have been forced to adapt or die. In the regulated market, lockdown house brothel owners can get away with acting like dicks without any real fear of it damaging their bottom line.

To show the girls dressing like princesses, the show moves to a montage of Bunnies trying on various outfits, and since this is Cathouse and on late night HBO we have to have some nudity early in the show, the scene shows them in the dressing room with dozens of outfits on racks, but has the Bunnies mostly only half-dressed for much of the scene. Dennis Hof comments on the Bunnies' proclivity for clothes, pointing out that many girls will go through six or seven outfit changes a day, trying to hit upon something that will attract a man's attention - when one is standing in a line with a dozen other girls trying to catch the eye of the single customer who walked through the door, it is a struggle to stand out. While she is changing into a bunch of cute outfits, Isabella talks about one reason she likes her time at the Bunny Ranch - she can play the role of the glamorous woman and fulfill people's fantasies, which makes her feel good. As has been hinted at before, the Bunny Ranch does not so much sell sex as sell fantasy, and Isabella's statement serves to confirm this explicitly.

This episode could also be called "the episode we recycled some patrons" and the first example is the couple who appeared in episode three Girlfriends in a lesbian encounter with Sunset Thomas who show up in the background of a scene at the Bunny Ranch bar while Sunset preens for Dennis in a very small blue dress. This is part of a montage of scenes showing a variety of Bunnies in a myriad of outfits, with some commentary from Danielle in which she says some of the working girls don't dress up at all, just wearing a t-shirt and socks and that works for them because they have cultivated the girl next door look. Unsurprisingly, the camera focuses on Isabella Soprano at this point, whose more relaxed and natural look makes Danielle's amazon glamour look forced and artificial. Danielle then says that for her, bikinis are her preference for attire, and I'll editorialize and say that Danielle probably thinks they make her look better than they actually do. As with most other things relating the Danielle, I find her bikinis to be not particularly attractive, but that is probably mostly because she is the one wearing them. One secret about men that most of the women at the Bunny Ranch don't seem to know (or if they do, they ignore it) is that we mostly don't care what they are wearing. Ladies: you could be wearing a burlap sack dress and it probably wouldn't have any effect one way or the other whether we would pick you out of the lineup.

The clothes montage ends with Air Force Amy wearing her favorite kind of outfit: covered in shiny baubles, loaded with piled on fake hair, and slathered with thick layers of makeup. This is the lead to the next segment, titled "Master of the Game", which Amy is supposed to be a prime example of. Dennis explains that "game" can be boiled down to confidence, and Amy certainly has boatloads of that. As Dennis says, Amy knows the psychology of the prostitution business better than anyone. Madam Suzette points out that no one has ever made as much money as she has, and this dovetails into a brief sex scene featuring Air Force Amy as she and Danielle do voice overs about what is clearly Amy's favorite topic: what a great party Amy provides. Danielle says that no one can party like Amy - when she has been in a two girl party with Amy the guy will be sweating, Amy will be sweating, and Amy seems to get energy "from the Gods" (or, given how haggard she looks in some episodes, maybe amphetamines, though that's just speculation on my part). Amy herself praises her own skills, and says that she sets high standards. Maybe I am just naive, but it seems to me that one you get the fundamentals of sex down, there is a limit on how good your party can be, and given that most of the Bunnies who work at the Ranch are professionals who do this for a living, they would all be pretty good at it. Which of course leaves me wondering what Amy does that makes her the "best". Everyone seems to agree that she brings in tons of money, which in a brothel seems like it would be the objective standard by which everything is measured, but based upon what one sees on the show, there really isn't any indication as to exactly why that would be so. The scene ends with Amy and her client giggling together as the intercom announces that it is "time to reparty", which is the euphemism the Bunny Ranch uses for "time's up". Amy apparently doesn't want to end the party, leading to an interview segment with Madame Suzette who says they will usually give an extra ten or fifteen minutes before they demand that a girl "hands over the man or gets him to give us more money". The lesson is this: no matter how much fun you may be having, at the Bunny Ranch you are on the clock.

This segues to Madame Suzette on the phone fielding a question that she probably gets about a thousand times a day: "who is the largest natural chested woman at the Bunny Ranch", to which she answers "me". Which leads to a discussion under the header "ABC of Triple D's" of some of the most obvious assets Bunnies use to entice clients: their breasts. First up are the natural chested girls: Danielle is "still natural", as is Vandalia. Sunshine Lane states that natural breasts are better because they shake and move. Deanna, in the most unsurprising revelation in history also reveals that her breasts are natural. Note for Deanna: If you are an A or B cup, most guys will assume you haven't had implants. Deanna then makes another completely unsurprising revelation: lots of girls enhance their assets, and we jump back to Air Force Amy, who says she was an A cup, but loves her larger chest. This, of course, shocks no one, as Amy seems pretty focused on the idea that all guys are drawn to large things like moths to a flame. Jaime Sweet makes one of her very few appearances on the show to declare that she had implants that she is very happy with. This being HBO, we have to get our recommended daily allowance of nudity, so this whole discussion of breasts serves as a set up for a montage of shots of topless and naked Bunnies.

And then the show takes a sharp left turn to focus on Vandalia - a dark-haired, large-assed, and heavily-tattooed Bunny (heavily tattooed for the time in which the show was filmed - several current Bunnies could probably match her for ink coverage) who is given as an example of a woman with confidence. Vandalia asserts that she "can make you feel good", which seems like a pretty basic requirement for taking up this line of work. She says "I'm a chameleon, I can be intimate, but also wild, tied up, blindfolded. It's all about feeling good". We get a brief talking head interview with Dennis in which he says he didn't know if he liked Vandalia with all her ink (he's apparently not a fan of tattoos) but that her personality and the fact that she has "no inhibitions" won him over. Apparently, for Dennis, one of the primary qualifications a woman can have that impresses him is a complete lack of inhibitions. Given that he owns a brothel, this seems unsurprising.

As Vandalia says "you come to a brothel for a reason" we see the return of yet another previously seen customer in the form of the mustachioed man who appeared back in What Men Don't Know (he was the guy who orally pleasured Shelly Duvell while keeping his blue jeans and work boots on), who, given that this segment is about Vandalia, picks her out of the lineup. During negotiations, both Vandalia and her client claim to be Native American, which I suspect is about as valid as my claiming to be French or Welsh. If they discuss price, HBO doesn't show it, but we are let in on what services the client negotiates for - oral both ways and sex. Which seems pretty bland after all the build up about how wild Vandalia is supposed to be. Which leads to a pretty routine sex scene after which Vandalia muses she would have dated this particular client on her own time if she had met him away from the Bunny Ranch, which is the kind of statement that I am sure helps to fuel the fantasies of guys like Mark from the Girlfriends episode.

This being an episode that seems to be constructed out of leftover footage, the show jumps tracks yet again to feature Isabella Soprano and another topic that seems to fascinate HBO - women who come to the Bunny Ranch to have same sex encounters. Isabella says her job involves meeting lots of different people all looking for something different (which falls into the category of yet another completely unsurprising revelation), and that she loves women, especially the many women she has been with who are trying lesbian sex for the first time.

We then get a quick funny scene of Isabella signing her "card" and noting she's running out of space on it (meaning she's gotten lots of customers) and giving a little "woo hoo".

Isabella then continues on the lesbian theme, saying the older she gets the more she loves women, although she didn't start with women until she came to the Bunny Ranch. Recycling a point made in Girlfriends, Dennis says there have always been women coming to the Ranch, but it was hush hush. A couple would come in and arrange for a party with the girl, and then he would head out to the bar. In short, he was not actually her partner, but merely her cover so she could try sex with another woman. Now, he says, they are open about wanting a sapphic sexual encounter. (I have to digress here and say Dennis: get some better glasses. The ones you wear during this interview segment look really dorky). We get a brief segment with Isabella and a female client talking to the camera, although there is no actual sex scene included. The client was apparently there for her first experience with another woman, and says Isabella treated her well.

The story moves on to show how cutting edge Isabella is in her use of technology. And since this is 2005, this means she's using e-mail to set up appointments. She says men can now schedule their trips around the availability of their favorite girl. This seems to be a large shift in the way legal brothels operate. If one looks at the geography of their distribution, one will note that they are mostly located along major highways. A little research reveals that most of them were established to cater to long-haul truckers and other travelers passing through Nevada, making these locations ideal. But that also meant that most business was basically spur of the moment - a client would walk in, select a woman from those available in the lineup, and get to business. But with the advent of e-mail and the ability of the Bunny Ranch to promote which Bunnies would be available on particular dates, the Bunny Ranch could shift to being a destination as opposed to a stopover. And clients could come knowing who they wanted to see ahead of time, and know that she would be there and available for them. Even so, this particular segment seems fairly quaint now, as a lot of hoopla is made over Isabella heavily working her e-mail connections.

But Isabella does lead into the next segment by saying she got an e-mail from a married man, and she doesn't know what to say to him in return, since she's worried his wife might see it. Note for Isabella: Not your problem. If he's dumb enough to send you e-mail that his wife might see if you e-mail him back, he's going to screw things up regardless of what you do. Just send him an e-mail saying you'd be happy to have sex with him for money and don't worry about it. But this little e-mail dilemma leads to Dennis going over another topic that seems to fascinate HBO - married men who come to the Bunny Ranch, noting that "Some girls say that the married men they are with who come in have wives who know they are there. They don't. Unless his wife is actually there with him, she doesn't know. Marriages don't work that way." Although I'm sure that there are probably exceptions to this rule, I am also pretty confident that this is mostly true. Guys who come to the Bunny Ranch without their wives are probably mostly sneaking around.

And this leads us to Danielle talking about her married clients. After repeating Dennis' line that most married men's wives have no idea they are at the Bunny Ranch, she talks about one of her regular clients who is married and who spends a lot of money to have her give him the royal treatment. Apparently he feels under appreciated at home, so he comes in and says he will spend an hour with Danielle. And then he adds more time, and then more time, and eventually ends up spending $10,000 for six or seven hours with her. That's about $1,400-$1,650 an hour for anyone who is interested. Danielle would get half of that, so her pay rate for six or seven hours of sex and pampering is between $700 and $825 an hour. In 2005 dollars. Does anyone really need to wonder why the Bunnies work at the Bunny Ranch? Proving that men are predictable creatures of habit, she says he does the same dance every time.

Dennis comes on to say that Danielle is brilliant, guys will come in looking for a big chested blond (which seems to be Dennis' preferred choice of woman - at least the blond part) and end up with her because of her personality before imitating some of the personality traits of hers that I find most grating - her voice and her constant stream of "don't you want some chocolate?" STOP WITH THE FUCKING CHOCOLATE METAPHOR!! Jesus H. Christ on a cracker but that was tiresome even before Danielle started using it, and now it is just annoying. Someone needs to tell Danielle that this metaphor was worn out before Darryl Dawkins was done with it and just retire it. Better yet, kill it dead and bury it under a slab of concrete so it will never be used again . . .

Oh, wait, back to the show. So Danielle negotiates with a client, and we get one of the handful of concrete references to money as Danielle tells him she charges $2,500 per hour. Once again, despite showing a client interaction, there is no actual sex scene. In a cut away interview Danielle says she tells clients that she's a very sensual lady and therefore they need at least an hour with her, and they usually go for it. Displaying what seems to be the typical attitude towards money, she says that they can afford to spend the money, and even if they can't they spend it anyway. As always in the Bunny Ranch, it comes down to money, which leads us to Danielle at the "hooker booker" window (yes, that's what they call their cashier) asking if she's the top booker for the month (i.e. did she make the most money that month). But she isn't. She's second. As she says, she is frequently the top booker for most of a month and then someone will pass her at the last minute, which seems to suggest to me that she has an odd pattern of doing lousy business at the tail end of a month.

Which is a set up for a segment titled "A Treat from the Middle East" where we see who passed Danielle for this particular month - a never before and never again seen hooker dressed up in a belly dancer's costume named Leila. Dennis says that Leila is often gone for months at a time, but then comes back and jumps right to the top of the earners list. Despite having an entire segment devoted to her, there is no sex scene involving Leila in the episode, continuing the established trend of the episode. One kind of suspects that these segments were relegated to what seems to be the "lefotver footage" episode at least partially because they have client interactions, but no accompanying sex scene. There is some suggestion that her thick accent (which some mistakenly assume is a Persian accent, but Leila is in reality half-Egyptian and half-French), her exotic look, and her somewhat aggressive style account for her success. But after watching the segment in which she clumps about "dancing" I have to wonder why the hell anyone would ever pick her over, well, almost any other working girl at the Bunny Ranch. Life is full of mysteries, and this seems to be one of them.

As if to wipe out the memory of Leila's horse-like clomping about, the show changes to a segment titled "Tools of the Trade" with Sunset, Isabella, Danielle, Daisy, and Felicia (and later, Air Force Amy and Deanna) in which a woman who looks like your grandmother and her red-headed assistant show a variety of large sex toys to the Bunnies. First up is a sex sling, which Felicia hops into to get a demonstration of how it works as she opines that sex machines are a real added bonus to a party. Isabella comments that she should be taking notes (although one would think that these sorts of devices aren't really that new to any but the most inexperienced Bunnies). Next up is a dome-like chair, and because HBO needs some more nudity, Sunset immediately strips down and jumps into it, while in the background Deanna gives her creepy smile (seriously, when Deanna smiles, she looks like she's channeling Spencer Pratt). The final toy demonstrated is the "g-ring", a big double ring with a seat belt that Daisy demonstrates. Though you rarely see on-camera nudity from Daisy, for this segment she goes all in giving a direct view of her vagina before Air Force Amy shows up with a dildo and some lube to work her over. Almost immediately everyone joins in for a massive lesbian orgy with naked bodies everywhere and all the toys getting use, including a set of dildos mounted on power tools. At the end, our grandmotherly saleswoman asks how many of the girls "got off", and in response every Bunny on camera raises her hand. And having given us as much sex and nudity to close the show as they can get away with while remaining in "soft-core porn" territory, the show closes.

It is difficult to assess She's Got Game as a whole, since the episode is so disjointed and to a certain extent incoherent. Though several of the individuals segments are modestly interesting, more than a few cover territory that has already been covered in other episodes - leading one to think that perhaps life at the Bunny Ranch is more routine than one might imagine. After all, if HBO is already rehashing the same topics just five episodes into the series, exactly how much variety there really is to the business conducted by the Bunnies. Either that, or the HBO producers just have limited imaginations concerning what makes for good television. In the end, despite the feeling that it is composed of segments that just didn't fit into other, better episodes, this is a decent enough episode that serves as sort of a "grab-bag" of Bunny Ranch topics and a chance to see some of the more rarely featured Bunnies (and a chance to see, in many cases, why they are not featured more often).

Previous episode reviewed: Getting It Up.

Cathouse     Television Reviews     Home

Review - Asimov's Science Fiction: Vol. 34, No. 7 (July 2010) by Sheila Williams (editor)


Stories included:
A History of Terraforming by Robert Reed
Haggle Chips by Tom Purdom
The Jaguar House, in Shadow by Aliette de Bodard
The Other Graces by Alice Sola Kim
Eddie's Ants by D.T. Mitenko
Amelia Pillar's Etiquette for the Space Traveler by Kristine Kathryn Rusch

Poems included:
The Gears of New August by Bruce Boston
Neosaur by Robert Borski

Full review: The July 2010 issue of Asimov's Science Fiction is something of a mixed bag. Containing a couple of fairly ambitious stories that simply didn't quite work, a couple of good but somewhat strange stories, one very bland story and one story that just doesn't work, the entire issue gave me a mixture of frustration and enjoyment. Overall I think the issue is still pretty solid, as I think that a publication like Asimov's should try to publish work that is a little experimental, but it would have been even better had the stories had just a little more polish on them.

I would call The Other Graces by Alice Sola Kim an ambitious failure. The story is about a teen struggling to make something of herself who apparently starts getting help from a version of herself from an alternate future timeline. The story is told almost entirely from the perspective of the teenage Grace (and the bits that are told from other perspectives probably would have been better left out) as she wrestles with whether accepting this sort of help cheapens her accomplishments, all the while realizing that she depends upon the unexpected aid. The story is very disjointed, making it difficult to follow, but it is an interesting idea and is put together in an ultimately interesting manner, which makes it a mess, but a kind of beautiful mess. Another story that was something of a mess, albeit for different reasons, is Aliette de Bodard's The Jaguar House, in Shadow, set in her alternate historical timeline in which the Chinese found the Americas first and changed the course of history. The story, such as it is, covers political infighting in the nation of Greater Mexica as religious issues drive the rise of a theocratic and bloodthirsty ruler and the opposition his reign engenders. The problem with the story is that if one is not familiar with the Xuya version of alternate history (and I am not) the story doesn't really explain what is going on or why we should care very much about the various characters. The story itself is readable, but I was as confused at the end as I was at the beginning. It did make me want to read more about Aliette's alternate history, which means I think one could call it a success, but as a stand-alone story it just doesn't quite work.

Haggle Chips by Tom Purdom, which follows immediately after The Other Graces, is a much more conventional story. It is basically a science fiction kidnapping with a few twists and quirks, as the main character is held hostage by a radical religious group seeking concessions from the planetary government. The main character in the story is both the titular "haggle chip" and the user of such chips to try to get his freedom. There's nothing particularly groundbreaking or noteworthy about the story, but it is a solid adventure story with a little humor, a little romance, and just enough science thrown in to fit the magazine. D. T. Mitenko's story Eddie's Ants, on the other hand, is somewhat bizarre, but mostly interesting due to the speculation it engages in concerning the nature of collective intelligence, and how such an alien being might be socially dysfunctional by nature. The story itself, detailing the humorous efforts of a frustrated ex-boyfriend to kill his former girlfriends nigh indestructible alien paramour, is moderately humorous. However, it is deadly serious when it comes to exploring alien psychology, how truly alien it might be, and why. Overall, Eddie's Ants was, to me, the most thought-provoking story in the issue. Also humorous is Amelia Pillar's Etiquette for the Space Traveler by Kristine Kathryn Rusch, written in the form a guidebook that gives "helpful" tips to travelers embarking on an extended space cruise. The tone is intended to be silly and farcical, but a lot of the jokes came off as somewhat forced, and the entire story was simply flat where it should have danced.

The cover story of the issue, and the one that is probably most likely to figure in awards season, is Robert Reed's A History of Terraforming. The story is built around the life of Simon, a single, long-lived but mostly otherwise unexceptional man who lives through much of the terraforming of the solar system. The story is as much about transhumanism, and how "terraforming" the solar system might change us as much as it is about how we might change it. Through all the upheaval, Simon remains hardworking, and just smart enough to have important jobs, but not so brilliant as to be caught in the focal glare of the political struggles concerning the destiny of humanity. like most truly insightful stories about the possible future courses of humanity, the story is more than a little disturbing, but Simon's bland everyman nature keeps things from getting too alien to be accessible to the reader. This wasn't my favorite story in the issue, but it is probably the one that most people will remember.

Overall, this issue had more ups and downs that most, but even the downs are mostly the result of an author trying to do something difficult rather than an author just turning in a bad story. In the end, the overall issue is worth reading, so it gets an average rating.

Note: This volume contains The Jaguar House, in Shadow by Aliette de Bodard, a 2011 nominee for the Hugo Award for Best Novelette.

Previous issue reviewed: June 2010
Subsequent issue reviewed: August 2010

2011 Hugo Award Nominees

Asimov's     Sheila Williams     Magazine Reviews     Home

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Random Thought - I Drew Donald Duck


For Magemanda's benefit over at Floor to Ceiling Books, I figured I'd post a version of Donald Duck that I drew a couple years ago. I can specify, since I put the date on the picture, that I drew it on November 1st, 2009. Maybe seeing an under the weather Donald will perk up Magemanda's nephew.

Random Thoughts     Home

Friday, February 11, 2011

Follow Friday - A Fifth of Following


It's Friday again, which means it's time for Follow Friday. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow the Follow My Book Blog Friday Host (Parajunkee) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow our Featured Bloggers - Ruby's Reads.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
Which brings us to the Follow Friday question of the week: What is your favorite romance hero-type? Stereotype wise. Do you like the strong silent type or the brute macho man?

This is not really a question that I can answer directly, since I don't really read "romance" as a genre. I don't even have any affection for the books that literary people are supposed to love like Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights. I just didn't like reading them. I didn't have any empathy for the characters, and I just didn't care what happened to them. So I don't really have a favorite romance hero type, since I don't really like the stories they appear in. I guess the closest thing that I would identify as a "romance hero" that appears in books I enjoy would be someone like Richard Sharpe of books like Sharpe's Rifles. So whatever romance hero-type he would be, that would be the romance hero-type that I prefer.

Go to previous Follow Friday: For the Fourth Time
Go to subsequent Follow Friday: Sixth Time Is the Charm

Follow Friday     Home

Review - The Wrath of Alexander the Great by Terry McCarthy


Short review: Alexander is laying siege to Tyre, which has the Book of the West, but Barkane is awesome, and will do anything to get them before Alexander does.

Haiku
Weapons are useless
His fists can punch through armor
Barkane is awesome!

Disclosure: I received this book as part of the LibraryThing Member Giveaway program. Some people think this may bias a reviewer so I am making sure to put this information up front. I don't think it biases my reviews, but I'll let others be the judge of that.

Full review: At the outset, I have a quibble with the cover. I understand that an author often has little or no influence on the cover that is attached to their book, but this seemed to me to be so glaring that I could not let it pass without comment. The title of the book - The Wrath of Alexander the Great - should be an indication of the time period in which the story takes place, that is during the life of Alexander the Great. However, the cover picture shows a trident superimposed on a collection of soldiers that are clearly dressed in Roman regalia, complete with what appear to be legion standards. Instead of showing Greeks, Macedonians, or even Persians, the cover instead provides a wholly anachronistic picture. This, as one might expect, gets the book off on the wrong foot.

This is unfortunate, since the book itself isn't actually bad, and the historical information it contains appears to be accurate. Unfortunately, the story itself has a number of problems in plotting and character that prevent what could have been a really good book from being anything more than a fairly average book. Oddly, despite Alexander's wrath being prominently featured in the title, Alexander doesn't actually appear in the book, and his army, occupied with one of the greatest feats of military engineering in history, serves as little more than a framing device for the story.

The story takes place after Alexander has smashed the Persian Empire, and has set his sights on the trading city of Tyre. Tyre, located on an island off the coast of what is now Lebanon, is supposedly impregnable with walls that rise directly from the sea preventing any invading force from landing to lay siege. Alexander famously undertook to change geography to his advantage, and had his soldiers build a causeway that extended the half mile distance from the mainland to the island. Against this backdrop is placed the protagonist of the story, a Carthaginian soldier named Barkane whose mission is to enter Tyre with a select team of Carthaginian warriors, recover state secrets of incalculable value to Carthage, and escape.

Barkane starts his task by seeking to set free a pirate captain named Sajan being held prisoner and condemned to death by the Cypriot navy. At this point, one of McCarthy's annoying literary devices rears its head - the escape is told from Sajan's perspective, and since he takes what turns out to be Barkane to be a drunk imprisoned with him he refers to Barkane throughout the chapter as "the drunk". This gets old really quickly, and is especially silly when it becomes obvious to everyone, including Sajan, that "the drunk” is not drunk at all. Yet he keeps referring to "the drunk". We are also told of Sajan's hatred for all things Greek (Sajan is a Phoenecian) and how he had been hunted and captured and condemned at the behest of one of Alexander's generals, a man named General Bousardis. Almost immediately Sajan's actions begin to make no sense at all. After he is rescued from certain death by Barkane and his men, his reaction is to immediately turn on them and throw his lot in with a bunch of Greeks. Eventually, he even throws his lot in with General Bousardis, joining up with the man who actively tried to have him killed in the opening chapters of the book. Why he does this is a complete mystery. It seems as if he just acts like an ungrateful pain in the ass through much of the book just because it is necessary for the plot complications to work. This sort of bizarre character action marks much of the book, and while Sajan's bizarre behavior is among the most egregious, it is not the only inexplicable element to the story.

Barkane himself is supposedly a brilliant and unconventional military tactician. But for most of the book Barkane is made to seem smart mostly by the expedient of having his enemies behave stupidly. His enemies fall for absurdly simple tricks - he bluffs his way into a Greek held town by having his men execute a cavalry maneuver supposedly unique to Alexander's elite "Silver Shields" that is so simple that untrained soldiers are apparently able to master it while on the run in less than a day of practice. One wonders exactly how stupid the Greeks he is dealing with are given this background. When discussing Barkane's plans McCarthy also uses and reuses another somewhat annoying literary device, often times "hiding the ball" from the reader, having half his plan known and having Barkane sagely pull on his half-ear and smile cryptically while refusing to reveal the remainder of his devious plan - while at the same time telling the story with Barkane as the viewpoint character, meaning that keeping his plan a secret makes no sense at all.

Before going further, I have to discuss one of my pet peeves about depictions of combat in the age of armor which doesn't just crop up now and then in The Wrath of Alexander, but litters its pages. If one were to count the number of times in the story in which Barkane or one of his men punches, kicks, elbows, or knees a fully armored man and doesn't break his hand, foot, or other appendage on that man's armor, one would be counting for a very long time. Soldiers in the era before gunpowder wore armor for a reason, and one of those reasons is "punching them in the nose" becomes singularly ineffective. (The sequence on page 138 is pretty typical, Barkane grabs two Greeks by their helmets and bangs them together, knocking one out, and then punches the other in the nose. One wonders how their helmets are supposed to prevent battlefield injuries from swords and spears if they can't even prevent fisticuffs from knocking them out). Every time Barkane kicked or punched some armor-clad enemy I groaned a little bit and lost a little bit of faith in the book. Also of seemingly little value are shields, with even the elite "Silver Shields" cavalrymen seemingly carrying their moniker only sparingly, and when they do, the shields are of little use other than getting in their way. Conversely, despite the hyper-effectiveness of fists and feet, weaponry seems to be of at best random usefulness. At times the composite bows carried by Barkane and his men seem incredibly deadly, at others they are completely ineffective, flipping from one extreme to the other without rhyme or reason. In one sequence, Barkane refuses to arm himself with a proffered knife, preferring to fight unarmed because somehow that is more effective. Granted, there are plenty of myths about martial arts masters being more deadly with their bare hands than with a weapon, but they are basically just that, myths. The only time a man with a weapon is less dangerous than one who is unarmed is when the man with the weapon is untrained, which category Barkane is decidedly not supposed to fall into. In short, all of the fighting sequences in the book are so wildly inaccurate that they are often unintentionally hilarious.

The story jumps about, as the Macedonian General Bousardis and his supposedly elite "Silver Shields" (who don't seem to be all that elite in practice) first set out to recapture Sajan, then set about hunting down Barkane. There are double crosses (mostly inexplicable ones undertaken by the apparently schizophrenically insane Sajan), near escapes, and desperate fights. Barkane picks up some unexpected allies, a couple of damsels in distress, and finally makes it into Tyre (and after hiding the ball for much of the book, finally reveals why he went to the trouble of rescuing and then riding herd on Sajan). In the end, the mission ends up not making much sense - one wonders why the MacGuffin had to be recovered, which proves to be really difficult, as opposed to destroyed, which would have been much, much easier. Like most of the plot elements of the story, the reasoning behind this goes unexplained. Having led Bousardis across much of Syria, Barkane confronts him in Tyre, outwits him, is betrayed by someone close to him, and is saved by serendipity. Barkane's method of recovering the MacGuffin is supposedly really sneaky, but it really appears to be so obvious that it is hard to imagine anyone would fall for it, even someone who seems to be as buffoonish as Bousardis, another inexplicable element of the story.

Finally, one element that just kept nagging at me through the whole book is this: Barkane is on the wrong side of history. While it is all well and good that he is a patriot who loves his adopted city of Carthage, it is Greek civilization as spread by the Macedonian conquests that forms the basis for our civilization, not the moribund and hidebound Carthaginian culture. While the Greeks left behind culture, learning, philosophy, and art, the Carthaginians left behind next to nothing. Through the book the informed reader feels the tension between rooting for Barkane to succeed (he is the hero of the story after all) and realizing that his victory will be ultimately meaningless and probably counterproductive. In the end, while the historical elements of the book are generally not too far off, the bizarre and inane actions of many of the characters, coupled with keystone cops style combat scenes, and a plot that makes little sense at all results in a book that is merely adequate. While the idea of a commando in ancient Persia sounds really interesting, the execution is just not sufficiently well-polished for this book to be worth more than a lukewarm recommendation.

Terry McCarthy     Book Reviews A-Z     Home

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Review - Analog Science Fiction and Fact: Vol. CXXX, No. 6 (June 2010) by Stanley Schmidt (editor)


Stories included:
The Annunnaki Legacy by Bond Elam
Space Aliens Taught My Dog to Knit! by Jerry Oltion and Elton Elliott
Connections by Kyle Kirkland
Heist by Tracy Canfield
At Last the Sun by Richard Foss
A Time for Heroes by Edward M. Lerner
Cargo by Michael F. Flynn
Probability Zero: Light Conversation by Alastair Mayer

Science fact articles included:
Der Mann, Die Frau, Das Kind by Henry Honken

Full review: This month's issue of Analog Science Fiction and Fact features stories about A.I.'s, MMOs, and nightmare dystopian futures. Like most issues, this one seems to have a mini-theme, although in this case there seem to be two: one features artificial intelligence, with a subtheme of artificial intelligence intersecting with online gaming, while the second deals with dystopian cautionary tales. overall, the stories in this issue are all fairly good, even the somewhat pedestrian cover story The Annunaki Legacy is decent. However the two science fact articles are merely average and Stanley Schmidt's lead editorial is so resoundingly awful that the entire issue gets downgraded from being slightly above average to merely average.

Normally, the editorial presented by Stanley Schmidt at the beginning of each issue is at most a mildly controversial affair, usually the result of coming at an issue from an unusual angle. The editorial in this issue, however, is so stunningly stupid that I feel compelled to comment upon it. Schmidt tries to argue a compromise position between advocates of scientific explanations of the universe and those who insist upon a religious one. He analogizes the explanations given to religion to simplified explanations given by adults to children when they ask questions like "why is the sky blue" or "where do babies come from". Essentially he takes the position that the religious answers were just stop gaps simplified to provide answers to humanity until it "grew up" and could handle the real explanations. Leaving aside the assumption that there was some sort of superior intellect (be it divine, alien, or otherwise) to provide this dumbed down version of the truth, the reason this argument is so astonishingly idiotic is that the various religiously based explanations are inconsistent with each other (each religion has its own version) and inconsistent with what we have discovered via science. In other words, they aren't "simplified" explanations, they are just wrong. It is as if when a child asked "why the sky is blue", instead of giving an actual simplified explanations like "because of the way the light from the sun interacts with the particles in the air", the adult instead said "because invisible fairies paint it that way". Furthermore, as Carl Sagan has pointed out, when an adult gives the sorts of answers Schmidt refers to, such as the stork explanation for infant origins, they are intended to discourage children from asking more questions. In an effort to show how religion and science can be "reconciled" in this way, Schmidt has fallen back on an explanation that results in the conclusion that, if God (or some analogy) exists, then he didn't want us asking questions, but to just shut up and be content with the blatantly incorrect answers handed to us. I don't think this is the message Schmidt intended, but it is the implication of the editorial. In addition, the editorial is astonishingly arrogant, implying that previous generations of thinkers could not have grasped the true answers for some reason, as if Babylonian and Greek philosophers were not merely hampered by poor tools, but were simply too stupid to understand reality and thus had to be handed simpler explanations. Frankly, I expect more of a man who is generally a smart and on the ball guy, so this editorial was a major disappointment.

The cover story of the issue is The Annunnaki Legacy by Bond Elam, the tale of a group of space explorers hunting for the elusive Anunnaki, an alien race that apparently took the form of Babylonian deities and raised humankind to civilization. The story covers the typical conflict between xenoarchaologists and xenobiologists trying to buy time to study a planet more fully while pitted against the evil mining interests that want to mine it for its resources. Like most stories of this type, the scientists stumble across an unexpected and paradigm shifting discovery and are able to put their thumb in the eye of the evil mining boss. The ending isn't entirely upbeat, meaning that this story isn't entirely a paint-by-numbers affair, but the ground it walks is pretty well worn.

Space Aliens Taught My Dog to Knit! by Jerry Oltion and Elton Elliott is the humor piece in the issue. The story revolves around a conspiracy theorist convinced that aliens have infiltrated the government who discovers that his worst fears are true. he struggles against the conspiracy and attempts to expose them, being confounded time and again, and in the end sets upon a solution that seems almost certain not to work. The story is pretty good, but like most humorous pieces it is pretty lightweight. Probability Zero: Light Conversation by Alastair Mayer is also an intended piece of humor about an intelligent slime mold living in the narrator's refrigerator. It is mostly goofy and little more than fluff. Connections by Kyle Kirkland also deals with the implications of A.I., this time in a dystopian future in which the government regulates everything and every character seems to be a member of the underground opposition. The story is ostensibly a murder mystery, but that's only more or less a framing story. I found this one slow at first, but it picked up substantially and I ended up liking it quite a bit.

Given the current Gulf of Mexico oil spill, At Last the Sun by Richard Foss seems to be extraordinarily timely. In this story, scientists studying the damaged waters off the coast of Louisiana stumble upon an unexpected discovery. Though the focus of their study is the deoxygenization caused by fertilizer runoff pouring out of the mouth of the Mississippi River and not the effects of an oil spill, thematically the story, concerning the effects of human indifference upon the environment, seems particularly apropos. Following on the "disastrous things humans do to themselves and their environment" theme is Cargo by Michael F. Flynn, a post-apocalyptic story in more or less classic form, with remnants of the collapsed modern society peeping around the edges of a primitive culture that has grown up scrambling in the rubble. The facts about the past has become mixed with myth, and taboos about forbidden technology have become entrenched. The story mostly explores how it is attitudes more than capabilities and resources that hold humans back and how thin the line is between the comfortable modern society we have today and a hardscrabble subsistence existence. Overall, this is the best story in the issue.

The science fact article this month Der Mann, Die Frau, Das Kind by Henry Honken covers a topic that crops up in Analog on a regular basis - the study of language. In this case, the study of gender in language ranging from English, which has almost no genderization of nouns, to exotic languages like Jul'hoan and Yimas (both real, the first from Namibia, the second from Papua New Guinea) that have dozens for gender indicators describing the gender of the object, its relation to the speaker, its relation to the listener and a variety of other attributes. It is decent enough, but I rarely find the language oriented science fact articles to be particularly interesting, since they generally cover mostly the same ground over and over again. There isn't anything wrong with this article, its just not very interesting. In Jeffrey D. Kooistra's Alternate View column, he complains about the negative reactions that his climate change skepticism has engendered, and promises to rhetorically "take the gloves off" when dealing with his critics in the future. Despite this, he does little in this article but talk about the science in Alfred Bester's classic The Stars My Destination and promise retribution in the future. Yawn.

Overall, the stories in this issue range from average to quite good, which would normally mean a positive recommendation from me. In this case, however, Kooistra's article is so petulant, and Schmidt's is so mind-blowingly stupid that by themselves they drag the whole down to being merely average. With the caveat that these two elements are truly bad and best avoided, I would give this issue a guarded recommendation.

Preview issue reviewed: May 2010
Subsequent issue reviewed: July/August 2010

Analog     Stanley Schmidt     Magazine Reviews     Home

Review - Analog Science Fiction and Fact: Vol. CXXX, No. 5 (May 2010) by Stanley Schmidt (editor)


Stories included:
Page Turner by Rajnar Vajra
Hanging by a Thread by Lee Goodloe
The Day the Music Died by H.G. Stratmann
Farallon Woman by Walter L. Kleine
A Talent for Vanessa by David W. Goldman
Fishing Hole by Rick Cook
Teaching the Pig to Sing by David D. Levine

Science fact articles included:
Robots Don't Leave Scars: What's New in Medical Robotics? by Stella Fitzgibbons, M.D.

Probability Zero:
Quark Soup by Bond Elam

Poems included:
Skippy the Robot by David Livingstone Clink

Full review: This is an above average issue of Analog, with many very good stories, a couple of excellent ones, and only one that falls on its face. This sort of issue is the kind that keeps me subscribing, because even though some other issues are mediocre, every now and then you get one that is chock full of good stuff like this one is.

Page Turner by Rajnar Vajra is a wandery, disjointed, stream of consciousness tale told in first person perspective by a woman trapped in a building collapsed by an earthquake. To keep her mind occupied while she waits for death or rescue, she spins stories about the quirky denizens of the independent bookshop where she works, with each snippet of a story having its own bizarre elements. The story never really lets you know if the narrator is recounting actual events, or if she is making things up to entertain herself - there is even some ambiguity on this score in the eventual denouement to the story, but that makes the story in many ways even more interesting. The story is hard to follow, incoherent at times, and absolutely brilliant.

Hanging by a Thread by Lee Goodloe is a fairly standard engineering problem story. Like most such stories, the characters find themselves in an alien environment, confronted by some disaster that requires on the spot problem solving in which they apply basic scientific principles and good engineering to save themselves and others. The story, like the classic example of the genre, The Cold Equations, ends up requiring a substantial sacrifice from the protagonists, which should have injected a fair amount of pathos in the story. Unfortunately, the story isn't really long enough to become truly emotionally invested in the characters. If the story had been somewhat longer, with more fleshed out characters, I think it would have been more effective.

Farallon Woman by Walter L. Kleine is a story about a woman without a past has to figure out her place in the world. I figured out the identity of the woman in the story pretty early on, and spent much of the rest of the story wondering why her boyfriend was such a dope that he didn't figure it out despite living with her and also wondering why the government infrastructure that was supposedly hunting for her didn't find her. To a certain extent, this is a problem stemming from the format of the story - in such a short story pretty much everything introduced has to link together in some way so it is very difficult to have a "big reveal" moment that both works and is not merely their result of hiding the ball entirely from the reader. However, the "secret" in this story is framed so clumsily that everyone in the story simply comes off looking like idiots. The woman's story and her background make the story modestly good, but she really only ends up seeming smart because those around her seem so dumb.

A Talent for Vanessa by David W. Goldman deals with the popular disorder of the day - autism - positing a future in which people with severe versions of the disorder who can serve as idiot savants have become fashionable as entertainers at parties and other venues. In a twist, some people elect to have brain surgery in an effort to become disabled in this way and join the entertainment community, much as people now have plastic surgery to improve their chances of making it in Hollywood. The story revolves around a talent agent who handles this particular type of entertainer and an apparently air-headed socialite who is contemplating making herself more popular by undergoing brain surgery. The story wants to be deeper and more meaningful than it is, but it is decent anyway.

Fishing Hole by Rick Cook is a darkly funny story about seafood. Specifically the story is about trilobites being served in Seattle sushi restaurants and the hunt for the source that this engenders. The story ends up in a fairly unusual place, which, while still funny, has something of a horror movie element to it. I liked it, but it isn't anything other than a funny little story. Also darkly humorous, The Day the Music Died by H. G. Stratmann deals with the issue of songs that simply get stuck in one's head and won't go away. In this case, it is a song that is so infectious that it causes huge worldwide troubles told with a comic bent. Probability Zero: Quark Soup by Bond Elam is, as usual for this series, humorous. In this case, the story covers the question of intelligent design, and provides a cautionary message for intelligent design advocates that they may not really want what they have been asking for.

Teaching the Pig to Sing by David D. Levine is the central story in the issue. It describes a dystopian future in which engineered royalty rule over all of humanity and the efforts of the resistance to try to change this. It is an interesting story because it makes that staple of space opera - a hereditary aristocracy - seem plausible in a technological society (something I consider to be a hard sell to make), and it takes the time to demonstrate that the political set up imagined for this future, distasteful as one may find it, is not wholly without merits which makes the inner conflict of the viewpoint character that much more interesting and believable. The story is somehow both predictable and unpredictable at the same time, and is quite good.

This month's science article, Robots Don't Leave Scars: What's New in Medical Robotocs? by Stella Fitzgibbons, M.D., is a fairly routine report on modern medical robotics. It seems that medical robotics is in more of an evolutionary stage rather than a period of radical transformation, so there is not much truly exciting in the article. It is somewhat timely, given the recent debate in the U.S. Congress over health care, and there do seem to be some indication that robotic technology could cut medical costs. On the other hand, there is also the danger that cutting medical spending could result in progress in this area coming to a grinding halt. John Cramer's Alternate View column, discussing the distribution of water and ice in the solar system and what this might mean for future terraforming efforts is more interesting, but is probably little more than speculative fantasy at this point.

As I said at the outset, this issue is full of good stories and only really has one that isn't as good as the rest. That story, Farallon Woman, despite its flaws, is still not really all that bad, so there really isn't anything to dislike in this issue, and quite a bit to like. Consequently, this issue gets a strong recommendation.

Previous issue reviewed: April 2010
Subsequent issue reviewed: June 2010

Analog     Stanley Schmidt     Magazine Reviews     Home

Review - The Nine Billion Names of God by Arthur C. Clarke


Stories included:
The Nine Billion Names of God
I Remember Babylon
Trouble With Time
Rescue Party
The Curse
Summertime on Icarus
Dog Star
Hide and Seek
Out of the Sun
The Wall of Darkness
No Morning After
The Possessed
Death and the Senator
Who's There?
Before Eden
Superiority
A Walk in the Dark
The Call of the Stars
The Reluctant Orchid
Encounter at Dawn
'If I Forget Thee, Oh Earth . . .'
Patent Pending
The Sentinel
Transience
The Star


Full review: In the introduction to The Nine Billion Names of God, Clarke writes that the thread that ties this collection together is that it is comprised of his favorite stories from his repertoire. Interestingly, it turns out that Clarke's favorite stories also turn out to include pretty much all of his best and most famous stories that were published between 1953 and 1966, which makes this an excellent collection. Whether one is unfamiliar with Clarke and trying to get a high-quality sampling of his work, or a long-time fan who wants to read through some of Clarke's best stories, this is a great collection to pick up.

The highlights of the book are, unsurprisingly, among Clarke's best pieces: the title story The Nine Billion Names of God, Rescue Party, Hide and Seek, The Wall of Darkness, Superiority, "If I Forget Thee, Oh Earth . . . ", and The Sentinel. (For those who do not know, the movie and book 2001: A Space Odyssey is an expanded treatment of The Sentinel). While these are the high points, pretty much every story in this volume is good - there is a reason that Clarke was considered one of the giants of the genre for the bulk of his career.

This is not to say that there are no missteps in the stories. Some of the story elements seem quaint now - the result of the stories having been written many decades ago. So, for example, the scene in The Sentinel in which the protagonist makes himself and his fellow lunar explorers breakfast by frying up some sausages seems, in retrospect, quite silly. The story Hide and Seek only works because the "seeker" doesn't have something as simple as a landing shuttle, which seems to me to be pretty weak engineering. And so on. Even still, most of the stories seem to have aged fairly well, with only a few elements here and there that have been invalidated by the passage of time.

The stories are mostly quite short, which should be easy enough to figure out when one realizes that twenty-five stories are packed into a volume that is a mere 240 pages long. Clarke's style is pretty straightforward and direct - each story had a main idea, and one or two central characters. Many of the stories, such as Hide and Seek or Summertime on Icarus, are what I call "engineering puzzle" stories in which the protagonist confronts a problem that threatens his life and uses basic science and engineering to solve it. Many others are "wonder" stories, such as Transience, The Nine Billion Names of God, or The Star, in which the reader is presented with the awesome majesty of the universe and invited to gaze in wonder. There are silly, humorous stories, such as Superiority and The Reluctant Orchid (although Superiority has a serious message hidden in its humor), and "shaggy god" stories such as Encounter at Dawn. And there are stories about both man's reach for greatness, such as The Call of the Stars, and man's foolish self-destructiveness, such as I Remember Babylon. In short, this collection is a huge grab bag that touches on almost every popular science fiction story type of the mid-Twentieth century.

Clarke is a practitioner and serial abuser of the "deep and meaningful last sentence" method of storytelling, as this device is used in several of the stories in this volume. To a certain extent, this probably stems from the era that the stories were written insofar as they first appeared in pulp magazines of the 1950s and 1960s, and this sort of "big reveal" moment was probably what the market demanded. Even still, the repeated used of this literary device gets a little wearying.

One story that I found particularly prescient was Death and the Senator. The science fiction of the story - the idea that an orbital hospital could be constructed and that patients would experience great benefits from being treated and recovering in zero-gravity conditions - appears to be somewhat optimistic. However, Clarke's narrative is dead-on when it comes to the short sightedness of politicians deciding whether or not to fund long-term scientific projects, and how this is likely to turn around and have substantial negative consequences as a result of our limited vision. Every time someone says "establishing a base on the moon will take a decade, so we can't start now", I think of this story and get a little bit angry.

Despite the various quibbles, the stories in the book are almost all good, with several rightly considered "great". The only stories I though were average at best were A Walk in the Dark, The Possessed, and Patent Pending and given that there are twenty-two other stories in the volume, all of superior quality, this is a minor point. Simply put, this is an excellent collection of stories from one of the top writers in the field of science fiction, and well worth reading for anyone who is a fan of the genre.

1951 Hugo Winner for Best Short Story: To Serve Man by Damon Knight (awarded in 2011)
1955 Hugo Winner for Best Short Story: Allamagoosa by Eric Frank Russell (reviewed in The Hugo Winners, Volume 1)

List of Hugo Award Winners for Best Short Story

1954 Hugo Award Nominees

Arthur C. Clarke     Book Reviews A-Z     Home

Monday, February 7, 2011

Review - Fantasy & Science Fiction: Volume 118, Nos. 3 & 4 (March/April 2010) edited by Gordon van Gelder


Stories included:
Amor Fugit by Alexandra Duncan
Star-Crossed by Tim Sullivan
Waiting for the Phone to Ring by Richard Bowes
Class Trip by Rand B. Lee
Fort Clay, Louisiana: A Tragical History by Albert E. Cowdrey
Make-Believe by Michael Reaves
Epidapheles and the Insufficiently Affectionate Ocelot by Ramsey Shehadeh
The Frog Comrade by Benjamin Rosenbaum
The Fairy Princess by Dennis Danvers
Blue Fire by Bruce McAllister

Science fact articles included:
The Wild Blue Yonder by Pat Murphy and Paul Doherty

Full review: The March/April 2010 issue of Fantasy & Science Fiction is one of the better ones in that has been produced since the change to bimonthly issues. Unlike some other issues that have a mixed bag of stories with a few highlights, a body of mediocre ones, and a couple of anchors weighing down the issue, this issue has uniformly good quality fiction punctuated by a few superior stories. The only drag on the issue is the somewhat less than impressive science fact article that probably should have simply been left out of the issue.

Star-Crossed by Tim Sullivan is a sequel to the previously published Planetesimal Dawn, featuring the same characters. This time they go on a wild journey through space and time traveling between dimensions. Characters once thought lost return and multiply as they hop between realities to try to stave off the destruction of their comrades. The story is quite convoluted, but never so much so that one loses track of the plot. Class Trip by Rand B. Lee is also a convoluted story, made even odder due to the fact that it is told nonsequentially, detailing the budding relationship between a human child and a truly alien alien. The story ends up making sense, but doesn't really come together until the very last bits, requiring the reader to mentally juggle a lot of out of context material until the appropriate context becomes apparent. This somewhat difficult storytelling device is necessary for the story to work, and doesn't prevent this from being a very good one.

Albert E. Cowdrey's story Fort Clay, Louisiana: A Tragical History is featured on the front cover of the issue. It is more of a horror story than a fantasy, concerning the mysterious events that doomed a Union garrison occupying an isolated island fort near New Orleans. It is appropriately creepy, but somewhat predictable, with the only thing making it really noteworthy being the Civil War backdrop against which most of the story plays out. Make-Believe by Michael Reaves is also a horror story, but with its cast of child protagonists and child-like villains it is actually much more effectively scary than Cowdrey's effort. A story about four kids at play that takes a seemingly supernatural turn, the commonplace nature of the surroundings make the horror all the more chilling in this story. Though the story falls back on the old standby device of having it told by an author recounting an event from his childhood, I still found it to be quite good. Also something of a horror story, but of a somewhat different character is Blue Fire by Bruce McAllister in which a fictional Pope confronts a child vampire in the Renaissance. The story delves into some religious questions relating to vampires that most stories ignore. The horror of the story is the theological trap in which the child vampire is caught rather than any threat that he, as a "blood-drinker" might pose to others. With its unusual angle, it makes the vampire story seem almost fresh again, which is a fairly major accomplishment for a short story.

Waiting for the Phone to Ring by Richard Bowes also revolves around a writer as the central character, this time a down-on-his-luck author asked to revive and revise a story he wrote while he was much younger for an old friend. The story dances on the edge between fantasy and delusion, revolving around a small circle of friends tied together by their common association with a strangely compelling, but long since dead, musician who may, or may not, have had psychic powers and may, or may not, have killed his teacher who may or may not have been his lover. The story weaves together several lives, although sometimes it is difficult to follow the various threads as it tires to be more artsy than Bowes really has the skill to pull off. It is still a decent story, but probably needed more editing.

Amor Fugit by Alexandra Duncan is a modest fantasy about a girl who lives with her mother by day, her father by night, and who has a ill-fated infatuation with a boy she meets. The story has a fairy tale like air to it, seemingly told from the perspective of an unknowing denizen of the timeless fairy realm who confront the real world for the first time. It is a bittersweet, touching story. Epidapheles and the Insufficiently Affectionate Ocelot by Ramsey Shehadeh is a humorous fantasy about the incompetent wizard Epidapheles as told from the perspective of his long-suffering sentient, invisible, ambulatory chair named Door. The wizard sets out to solve the problem of an idiot King besotted with an ocelot and gets entangled in court politics in which supporters of the Queen seek to replace the King on the throne with her. Door and Epiphalides have a sort of Jeeves and Wooster relationship that infuses the entire story with humor. Door has something of a happy ending, as does the Queen, although not in a way that undermines the rest of the story. The Frog Comrade by Benjamin Rosenbaum is another story told with a fairy tale sensibility, but this time it is a subversion of the classic frog and princess story. It turns out that the frog is a socialist, and the princess lives through political upheaval that leads through a socialist state to a capitalist state and finally finds love. In the end, the princess does kiss the frog, but she ends up even more confused than ever. The story is told with humor, and although the politics are fairly simplistic, the story is still good.Despite its title, The Fairy Princess by Dennis Danvers is not a fairy tale story. Instead, it is a fairly unsettling tale about a woman working the night shift as a factory dedicated to making robot sex toys. She uncovers a conspiracy with a surprising source, and makes an unusual friend.

The issue also includes the science fact article The Wild Blue Yonder by Pat Murphy and Paul Doherty. Unfortunately, like most science fact articles in Fantasy & Science Fiction (and as far as I can tell, all science fact articles that Pat Murphy has a hand in writing), the article is not particularly interesting or insightful. The article talks about model airplanes and taking play seriously as a way to learn physics. It makes some noises about the Bernoulli effect not actually working, but doesn't really back that claim up very well, and doesn't really say anything else that makes the article particularly worth doing much more than skimming through.

With the exception of the weak science fact article, everything in this issue makes for an enjoyable read. The funny stories are funny, the scary stories are scary, and the strange ones are strange, and all of them are insightful and interesting. All of the stories range from decent to pretty good, with the best probably being either Blue Fire, Amor Fugit, or Class Trip.

Previous issue reviewed: January/February 2010.
Subsequent issue reviewed: May/June 2010.

Gordon van Gelder     Fantasy & Science Fiction     Magazine Reviews     Home

Friday, February 4, 2011

Follow Friday - For the Fourth Time


It's Friday again, which means it's time for Follow Friday. To join the fun and make now book blogger friends, just follow these simple rules:
  1. Follow the Follow My Book Blog Friday Host (Parajunkee) and any one else you want to follow on the list.
  2. Follow our Featured Bloggers - Kathy of Vision Quest Fail.
  3. Put your Blog name and URL in the Linky thing.
  4. Grab the button up there and place it in a post, this post is for people to find a place to say hi in your comments.
  5. Follow, follow, follow as many as you can, as many as you want, or just follow a few. The whole point is to make new friends and find new blogs. Also, don't just follow, comment and say hi. Another blogger might not know you are a new follower if you don't say "Hi".
  6. If someone comments and says they are following you, be a dear and follow back. Spread the love . . . and the followers.
  7. If you want to show the link list, just follow the link below the entries and copy and paste it within your post!
  8. If you're new to the Follow Friday Hop, comment and let me know, so I can stop by and check out your blog!
Which brings us to the Follow Friday question of the week: What is the book you are currently 'pushing'? (Pushing meaning trying to get people to read it).

Other than giving good reviews to books I like, I don't really 'push' books. I'll digress with a brief anecdote. Many years ago I went with a group of friends to see the movie Noises Off, a quirky theatre based comedy with a really good cast - Michael Caine, Carol Burnette, John Ritter, Christopher Reeve, Marilu Henner, Nicolette Sheridan, Denholm Elliott, and Julie Hagarty. We absolutely loved the movie, and were falling out of out seats with laughter. Someone at work the next day asked if I'd seen any good movies lately, so naturally I recommended Noises Off. She went to see it, and absolutely hated it. Maybe the reason my friends and I loved the movie was that we were all active in our local community theater group. I don't know. But the end result is that I tend to not recommend movies, books, or television shows to anyone unless I know they tastes really well or, as I do on my blog, I can give a reasonable explanation as to why I liked (or disliked) a book, and the recipient of my thoughts has a basis on which to decide if they want to take my advice or not. Because, in my opinion, the reason why someone likes a book is far more important that the mere fact that they liked it.

Go to previous Follow Friday: Again, Again
Go to subsequent Follow Friday: A Fifth of Following

Follow Friday     Home

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Review - The Gnoll Credo by J. Stanton


Short review: A heavy-handed condemnation of modern society coupled with some Randian-style ramblings couched in the guise of a generic fantasy world.

Haiku
Gnoll society
Superior to human
Paleolithic

Disclosure: I received this book as part of the LibraryThing Early Reviewers program. Some people think this may bias a reviewer so I am making sure to put this information up front. I don't think it biases my reviews, but I'll let others be the judge of that.

Full review: The Gnoll Credo is a book of libertarian atheistic philosophy thinly disguised as a work of bad fantasy. The idea of examining a nonhuman viewpoint using fantasy sensibilities to do so is certainly an interesting and intriguing idea. Sadly, the nonhuman viewpoint isn't much more than a rehash of some fairly standard libertarian ideas. I generally look favorably on libertarian fiction - I have a large number of Prometheus winners and nominees in my library - but the first requirement of a piece of fiction is to be good fiction and unfortunately, this is more of a lecture dressed up in generic fantasy clothing.

The first problem I have with the book is that the fantasy elements are so very, very generic. Everything is couched in generic terms - there is a generic fantasy city ruled over by a generic Duke, who has troubles with a generic bishopric and funds a generic university, and a generic frontier town that is visited by generic caravans carrying generic trade goods. The various evil denizens are generic: there are lion men, wolf men, orcs, trolls, ogres, and of course, the hyena men, or gnolls. Most of the descriptions of the various humanoid creatures could have been taken directly from the pages of a fantasy role-playing game such as Dungeons & Dragons. The gnolls, described as hyena-like, appear to be identical in form to those that can be found in the various D&D Monster Manuals. On the whole, the fantasy element of the book reads more or less like the fluff text of a generic role-playing game supplement. Partially because of the incredibly generic nature of the fantasy, the various characters are never entirely convincing as being real, and as a result the reader simply doesn't care about them or their musings on the meaning of life.

This would have been excusable if the story had been a good one, but there isn't really a story here. The book is composed of the fictional scholarly studies on the gnoll race done by the fictional researcher Aidan O'Rourke who interacts with an especially intelligent gnoll named Gryka. The book is mostly made up of little vignettes, each of which is supposed to illustrate some element of gnoll culture that shows how it is superior to human culture. Gnoll culture is presented as an extreme hunter gatherer society, lacking in any religion of mysticism, with a matriarchal structure and a devil-may-care philosophy of life. The gnolls are supposedly completely fatalistic and utterly free of hypocrisy, resulting in a happy bunch of supposedly nomadic tribesmen. This is, of course, contrasted with the humans who are "slaves" to other humans because they are tied to land as farmers that they have to defend (never mind that gnolls are, according to the book, tied to a territory that they will defend). I will digress for a second and recommend Ride of the Second Horseman by Robert L. O'Connell in which he describes what he calls the "plant trap", and why it is beneficial and why it caused warfare, covering this ground more effectively and in more detail. Among many other faults humans are, according to the gnolls, too tied to possessions and too worried about what might happen.

Oddly, at one point the story goes on about how humans are bad hunters. I say this is odd, because the one thing history tells us is that humans are the most effective hunters in our world's history. The book does this by separating humans from the fruits of their intellect, and comparing them to the natural gifts attributed to gnolls. But that's just silly. Humans are ferociously effective hunters because of our prodigious minds, and splitting them up simply misses the point. We are, in fact, such effective hunters that we convinced our prey to live under our protection so that we can eat them any time we want to. This, of course, doesn't fit the philosophical point being made in The Gnoll Credo, so it is taken as yet another weakness of humans that we rely upon domesticated animals. But the human mind, and human imagination which allows that kind to conceive of things that have never existed before, is what allows us to dominate. Oddly, the gnolls in the story are supposedly able to guide the development of their species via self-directed breeding programs (a form of artificial selection mislabeled natural selection in the book), but at the same time supposedly never daydream, or even seem to have any kind of imagination. The contradiction here should be obvious: if you are unwilling or unable to conceive of something that has never been, it is hard to see how one would conceive a way to develop a version of your own race that does not yet exist.

As an aside, one of the elements that repeatedly pulls the reader out of what little story there is the constant insertion of somewhat anachronistic elements. Aidan, for example, refers to the Goidelic heritage behind his name. The characters talk about the theory of evolution by natural selection. Late in the book, when the author seemingly feels the need to beat the reader over the head with his point, references are made to Orwell, Islam, and the internet. And there is copious amounts of modern profanity. At some points the page is littered with "fuck", "cock", "ass", "shit", and so on. This is not in and of itself a problem, but most of the profanity seems to be added merely out of a desire to seem edgy and daring for its own sake. Instead, it comes off as slightly pathetic. At one point there is even a version of "in Soviet Russia, the dice roll you" in the book. This sort of incongruity makes the characters in the story, that were already not particularly convincing, even less so.

So what are we left with? Basically the book is an extended lecture on how screwed up human society is because we have farming, and civilization, and religion, and fantasies (which is odd, because if we didn't, then this book would not exist), and how much cleaner and purer the hypothetical gnoll society is. Over and over Aidan is stunned to silence by the supposedly great insights Gryka confronts him with. The only real conclusion a reader can come to is that Aidan is seemingly pretty easy to stun. After making his argument not very subtly, the author adds an epilogue in which he repeats his argument in a didactic manner, beating the reader about the head and shoulders with his point. But the point, that humans are called by their blood to be hunters, and we would be happier (and presumably better off) if we discarded civilization and emulated the gnolls as hunters is simply unconvincing. The argument is something of an extreme form of libertarianism that only works for the strong and the lucky. But who would really want to give up modern dentistry, modern medicine, music, art, literature, heated homes, indoor plumbing, and all the other fruits of civilization in exchange for the joys of the freedom of the hunt. It is not enough to say some people do not enjoy these benefits, the answer there is to work towards a society in which they do. Yes, we are hunters by evolutionary heritage, but that does not mean that is all we are, or all we can be.

Finally, lurking on the edges of the argument is the idea that religion and mysticism is a frippery that humans have that the clear headed gnolls have eschewed. I am not particularly in favor of religion, but what it reflects is the vast imagination of humans, and I contend that this vast imagination is the foundation of human civilization and no thinking creature can exist without such an imagination. It is the ability to conceive of a thing that does not yet exist that allows for the creation of innovative things - even things as simple as a stone cutting tool. Our imaginations are so powerful that under their influence we put spirits in the trees, pictures in the sky, and gods behind the mountains and then convince ourselves that they are real. Gnolls, supposedly lacking in such thinking, would be unable to do any of the things they are depicted doing in the book. As a result, the argument made in the book simply does not stand up on its own merits.

In the end, The Gnoll Credo is simply a mess. It is mostly inoffensively bland as a fantasy story, and entirely unconvincing as a philosophical piece. With only two real characters in the book, it is telling that they remain little more than cardboard mouthpieces for the author. While this book might be of some modest use for someone trying to play a fantasy role-playing game who wanted some sort of in-depth treatment of a hypothetical gnoll society, as a piece of fiction or a piece of philosophy it is simply not that good.

J. Stanton     Book Reviews A-Z     Home